Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (1599) - TV Shows (38) - DVDs (2)

A visual spectacle beyond belief

Posted : 13 years ago on 5 December 2011 02:19 (A review of Immortals)

"My mark...will be left on this world forever."

The marketing team for Immortals want you to believe that the picture is a cross between 300 and the recent Clash of the Titans remake, situating muscular, sword-wielding 300-esque heroes within an action-packed tale concerning Greek Gods and myths. The description is somewhat suitable, but such a comparison would be trivialising Immortals; a film that's brilliant enough to stand as its own unique specimen. Although it won't get any acclaim for its script or human factor, the visual style is what makes this flick such a keeper. Coming from perfectionist Indian filmmaker Tarsem Singh, Immortals is a genuine stunner of a visual feast and an enthralling cinematic experience. This is the kind of stuff we go to the cinemas to see!



The anarchic King Hyperion (Rourke) is looking to conquer mortal men, and begins searching for a God-like weapon known as the Epirus Bow to help him unleash the malevolent Titans. Hyperion achieving his goals would bring about mankind's destruction, as well as the end of the reign of Zeus (Evans) and his pantheon of Gods. After witnessing the desecration of his village and the death of his mother at the hands of Hyperion, skilled peasant Theseus (Cavill) vows revenge. As Hyperion rallies his troops, Theseus prepares for the battle of his life with assistance from thief Stavros (Dorff) and virgin oracle Phaedra (Pinto) whose visions imply that disaster is ahead.

Comparing Immortals to 300 on the basis of how it looks is unfair - Singh's film may share the same producers, but it's not much like Zach Snyder's earlier feature at all. Snyder set out to replicate the look and feel of a Frank Miller graphic novel, but Singh's visual style is inspired by ancient Baroque art (that is, sculptures and paintings which are exaggerated and ornately detailed to convey as much information as possible without words). The exact essence of Baroque has been captured by Tarsem and cinematographer Brendan Galvin, who have used phenomenal shot composition and a gorgeous colour scheme to communicate drama and chaos with minimal lines of dialogue. It's a truly masterful approach. After all, movies are a visual medium and, as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. Every nickel of Immortals' estimated $75 million budget is accounted for on the screen, with lavish costumes, highly-detailed sets, and plenty of digital effects which infinitely extend the film's scope. While blockbusters with a surplus of CGI usually fail to gel, the technique actually works here because the effects are solid and have weight and inertia, and it suits the aesthetic.



The narrative eventually culminates with a concluding act dedicated to action and warfare, with Hyperion charging the final stronghold of men and looking to breach the Titans' mountain prison. Immortals has isolated action beats throughout the first two acts that leave you breathless, but the climax is a spectacle beyond belief. Tarsem avoided the shaky-cam/rapid-fire editing approach which is notorious for turning action into an incomprehensible blur. Instead, the framing is often wide and sturdy, allowing us to enjoy the carnage and actually watch the terrific fight choreography. There is the occasional use of slow motion whenever the Gods are around due to their superhuman speed, but the technique is not frequent or distracting. If anything, there's not enough slo-mo, because there's so much violent awesomeness to see and so little time to properly absorb it. On this basis, Immortals deserves multiple viewings. Granted, it's difficult to get emotionally invested in the picture's story and characters, but it's also difficult to tear your eyes away from the screen because it's constantly bursting with rich, layered, enthralling imagery.

As Theseus, Henry Cavill (a.k.a. the new Superman in Zack Snyder's Man of Steel) admittedly has difficulties trying to act tough, but he's nevertheless sincere and earnest, and he has a likeable screen presence. (His work here is definitely better than Sam Worthington's performance in Clash of the Titans.) Meanwhile, it seems like Mickey Rourke had a grand old time chewing the scenery as the wicked King Hyperion. Mickey's performance affords the film a genuine sense of gravitas, and the star is not as underused here as he was in Iron Man 2. Digging into the supporting cast, a surprisingly ripped Stephen Dorff is solid as Stavros, while Freida Pinto was a good pick for the virgin oracle. Rounding out the cast is Luke Evans, who's terrific and intense as Zeus' God form.



Perhaps the biggest shortcoming of Immortals is the lingering sense that there should be more - more to the journey, more to the narrative, and more to the scope in general. It leaves you thinking that a bigger budget could have allowed for an extra 20 or 30 minutes of material to leave the film feeling truly epic. However, none of this implies that Immortals is unsatisfying. On the contrary, it's an almost instant classic, and it says something about the quality of the movie if your biggest criticism is that it leaves you wanting more of it. While Immortals fails to pack the emotional punch of 300 or Gladiator, this is a beautifully-rendered flick which delivers what it promised on the tin. In other words, if you're a joyless cynic you'll probably hate it, but if you can embrace the material and appreciate the choice of visual storytelling, you'll enjoy yourself immensely.

7.6/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Movie!

Posted : 13 years ago on 5 December 2011 09:01 (A review of It's a Wonderful Life)

"Strange, isn't it? Each man's life touches so many other lives. When he isn't around he leaves an awful hole, doesn't he?"


A Christmastime staple, Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life is a rare film which has withstood the test of time and continues to touch millions of people through its themes, boundless appeal, and emotional power. Admittedly, compared to Miracle on 34th Street or National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation, It's a Wonderful Life is not exactly a Christmas film in the classical sense - after all, only the finale occurs on Christmas Eve, and the story has nothing to do with Santa Claus. Nevertheless, this film encapsulates the true spirit of the holiday: the value of family and friends, and the importance of giving rather than receiving. Furthermore, It's a Wonderful Life can be watched at any time of the year because of its feel-good themes as well as its potent message about the significance of a single human soul.


The story commences on Christmas Eve, with a chorus line of prayers originating from the small town of Bedford Falls pleading for the angels to aid the despairing George Bailey (James Stewart). The unsung hero of Bedford Falls, George aspired to travel the world and study at University, but was forced to relinquish his dreams to manage his late father's business to make sure it won't fall into the hands of wealthy schemer Mr Potter (Lionel Barrymore). George always acts in the interests of others, and in his adult life, he marries the beautiful Mary (Donna Reed) with whom he has four beautiful children. However, financial problems and personal issues suddenly mount, overwhelming George and plunging him into a tragic abyss of despair. Enter George's guardian angel Clarence (Henry Travers), who arrives from Heaven to heighten the depressed man's spirits. To achieve this end, Clarence shows George a vision of a world in which he never existed.

Flashbacks constitute the first two-thirds of It's a Wonderful Life, with Clarence learning about George's background and observing the events leading up to his suicide contemplation. Such a device is a structural masterstroke, as it allows viewers to see George's past alongside Clarence. Additionally, the script meticulously develops George's character while the knowledge of his depression sits at the back of our minds. Conveying an entire movie's worth of material, Capra accommodates the full breadth of George's life, treating it with the care it deserves. We become immersed in George's existence, and we fall in love with the man; it seems impossible that anything could threaten to destroy his life, or he could lose his temper. This brand of gentle, enthralling character development is gratifying and essential, letting us see what's at stake when Clarence at long last descends to earth to meet George. And since we grow to love George so much, the climax is all the more poignant (almost unbearably so).


It's a Wonderful Life is such an effective feel-good movie because it asserts the notion that everyone, regardless of how insignificant they may seem, can make a difference. The angels describe life as "God's greatest gift", and Capra delivers the message that worldly riches mean nothing compared to love, family, friends, honesty and integrity. This all culminates with a goosebump-inducing finale, which never fails to leave this reviewer a blubbering mess. Indeed, anybody who is not moved by the flick's final few minutes should wonder what is wrong with them. Additionally, It's a Wonderful Life is so often referred to as cheesy and sentimental, but it's also surprisingly dark at times. The lead-up to George's depression is heart-wrenching in its bleakness, and George's lurid odyssey through Pottersville - a community in which he was never born - contains traces of film noir, as it's realistically gloomy.

Capra makes the most of the estimated $3 million budget; It's a Wonderful Life is a technically impressive motion picture from top to bottom. The fictional town of Bedford Falls seems authentic, as the crew actually constructed an elaborate main street consisting of numerous buildings and stores; consequently, it feels like a lived-in town as opposed to a studio back-lot. Additionally, filming took place during summer months, necessitating the creation of artificial snow. Fake snow often fails to convince, but every flake of snow in It's a Wonderful Life looks genuine. Admittedly, there are a few technical issues, such as wide shots not precisely matching close-ups, or a shonky transition as Clarence disappears during a scuffle, but such shortcomings scarcely matter. Capra's pacing is magnificent, while the black & white, 35mm photography (courtesy of three credited cinematographers) bursts with visual flair. And although the film is vehemently a drama, gentle humour livens the proceedings from time to time, making the viewing experience even more delightful.


While Capra and his co-writers (Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett) deserve some of the recognition for It's a Wonderful Life's brilliance, Stewart's immaculate performance truly makes the film work. Stewart portrays George Bailey with a deft mixture of innocence and integrity, not to mention humanity and fallibility, which ensures viewers will root for him from the outset. Stewart fits the role like a glove - he's amiable and convincing, and his desperation and despair is increasingly apparent when he's submerged into the vision of Pottersville. Equally striking is Reed as George's wife, Mary. Reed was not Capra's first choice, but it's hard to imagine anyone else in the role, as she embodies the sweetness required to convincingly capture George's heart. Meanwhile, as George's guardian angel, Travers is utterly charming. The rest of the supporting cast is just as impressive - Barrymore emanates cunning and malice as the wicked Potter, while Thomas Mitchell makes for an endearing (albeit incompetent) Uncle Billy. Capra never allows a faulty acting moment to sneak into his masterpiece.

With It's a Wonderful Life's strong reputation and almost unanimous acclaim, it's difficult to believe that it was not a hit during its theatrical release. In addition to mixed reviews, the box office earnings were underwhelming, which doomed Capra's newly established production company, Liberty Films. It earned a few Academy Award nominations, but won nothing at the ceremony. Subsequently, It's a Wonderful Life fell into relative obscurity until the picture's copyright expired and it entered the public domain, meaning that television stations could play it ad nauseam without the need to pay royalties. Thus, it was used as a TV time-filler during the Christmas season, resulting in its rediscovery by a whole new generation. At last, decades later, the reviews were uniformly positive, and It's a Wonderful Life received the love and acclaim it always deserved. If It's a Wonderful Life was never created, the world would have been worse off for it.

"You see George, you've really had a wonderful life. Don't you see what a mistake it would be to just throw it away?"

10/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Sublimely engaging... The acting is excellent

Posted : 13 years ago on 4 December 2011 01:19 (A review of Notes on a Scandal)

"I hadn't been pursued like this for years... I knew it was wrong, and immoral, and completely ridiculous, but, I don't know. I just allowed it to happen."

Based on Zoe Heller's novel What Was She Thinking?, 2006's Notes on a Scandal is a drama-thriller in the mould of films like Fatal Attraction and Single White Female. It's a movie which burrows into the human psyche in order to explore the deepest, darkest recesses of obsession and loneliness. On top of this, Notes on a Scandal is very much an acting main event which brings together two of the greatest actresses of this generation - Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett - and pits them against one another. Suffice it to say, the resulting flick is sublimely engaging.



An elderly battle axe of a teaching veteran, Barbara Covett (Dench) enjoys writing in her diary on a constant basis, chronicling fantasies and experiences as she gossips for her own entertainment. Past the age of 70, Barbara is approaching retirement, and has become overly cynical and disenfranchised with today's youth and school system. Enter naïve new high school teacher Sheba Hart (Blanchett), whose idealistic aspirations exceed her abilities, and who has trouble fitting in with the experienced educators. Sheba finds a good, strong friend in Barbara, though, and the pair hit it off marvellously. However, Barbara soon witnesses Sheba having a sexual tryst with 15-year-old schoolboy Steven (Simpson). She agrees to protect the secret, but begins advising Sheba on what to do about the situation, all the while harbouring a more sinister agenda.

Notes on a Scandal is so effective thanks to its penchant for fascinating character psychology. With the narrative framed by voiceovers in the form of entries in Barbara's private journal, we are invited into Barbara's head from the very outset. On the surface Barbara seems like a sweet, frail old woman, but her acerbic internal thoughts provide an effective snapshot of her calculating mind that's overloaded with pretentious, unforgiving thoughts as she discusses her recent conquests and schemes. Barbara is the antagonist of the film of course, and your sympathies will likely be with Sheba due to how human she is, but Barbara is nevertheless fleshed-out and three-dimensional enough that you cannot flat-out label her as a bad person. Another strong suit of Notes on a Scandal is the dialogue, which is consistently engaging. Screenwriter Patrick Marber (who also wrote Closer) has done a phenomenal job of translating the book to the screen, leading to a much-deserved Oscar nomination.



Marber's script was magnificently brought to life by director Richard Eyre, whose efforts keep the film moving forward at a swift pace with literally no lags or boring patches. Sure, it'd be easy to craft a great movie with such a superlative script and this ensemble of fantastic performers, but it fell to Eyre to keep the film tight and disciplined; a task he fulfilled magnificently. Such luminosity extends to the Oscar-nominated score by Phillip Glass, which is permeated with layers of strings to add further dimension to the onscreen action. On a less positive note, though, Notes on a Scandal falters as it approaches the finish line. Writer Patrick Marber lightened up the tone of the ending of Heller's book, leading to a poor final scene that feels too mainstream-friendly. Ultimately, the conclusion does not match the story's potential, and it flames out on a note of "meh" rather than staying true to the dark emotional intensity preceding it.

At its heart, Notes on a Scandal is a masterclass of acting, with Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett perfectly bringing life to their flawed, multifaceted characters. Dench has consistently shown that she's a versatile actress, but here she manages to surprise us yet again. While the role asked for Dench to be cruel and callous, she also had to sell the character's vulnerability as well as Barbara's sweet old woman exterior. Remarkably, she pulled it off. This could be Dench's finest performance to date; she's a tour de force, tackling the role of Barbara as if it was tailored for her. Her work is deliciously rich as well, making multiple viewings absolutely essential in order to catch all of the nuances on display. Meanwhile, Cate Blanchett is a perfect acting foil for Dench. Enthralling and emotionally dense, Blanchett inhabits the role; you feel as if you're seeing Sheba instead of just Blanchett. Not to be overlooked, the often comically-oriented Bill Nighy proves here that he's a strong dramatic actor. His interactions with Sheba and his Down Syndrome-suffering son are perfectly naturalistic and convincing, and a scene discussing Sheba's schoolboy dalliance proves that Nighy can handle intensity and emotion.



Student-teacher relations are certainly a topical issue in this day and age. Such criminal offenses are alarmingly common, and each case often gets plenty of press. A very adult film, Notes on a Scandal tenderly explores these types of relationships within the context of a transfixing psychological thriller brimming with emotional intensity. Viewers expecting a Dench/Blanchett pair-up to play for more a conservative or mainstream audience are advised to take note of its subject matter before watching.

7.8/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Unmistakably banal and pointless

Posted : 13 years ago on 3 December 2011 01:03 (A review of Silent Night, Deadly Night)

"You see Santa Claus tonight you better run boy, you better run for ya life!"

Due to its premise concerning an axe-wielding serial killer dressed in a Santa Claus outfit, Silent Night, Deadly Night stirred up quite a ruckus when it hit cinema screens back in 1984. Most notably, renowned critics Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert positively detested it, calling the film both irresponsible towards the spirit of Christmas and morally reprehensible. Now a cult classic, Silent Night, Deadly Night is seriously flawed, but it nevertheless remains a somewhat enjoyable little slasher that does have its charms.


Opening on Christmas Eve in the 1970s, 5-year-old Billy is looking forward to receiving presents from his beloved Santa Claus. However, Billy's mentally disturbed grandfather (Hare) shatters his excitement and frightens the impressionable youth, warning Billy that Father Christmas will punish the naughty children. The lad's fear is only exacerbated when he subsequently witnesses his parents being brutally murdered by a man in a Santa costume. Following this, Billy and his little brother are sent to a Catholic orphanage where Billy's psychological trauma is worsened by the nuns' strictness. Fast forward 10 years, and Billy (Wilson) is a productive member of society with a job at a local toy store. But when Christmas season approaches, Billy's boss forces the traumatised boy to don a Santa outfit and act as the jolly big man. Things do not go well, however - Billy snaps, grabs an axe, and sets out to punish all the naughty boys and girls.

The entire first half of Silent Night, Deadly Night is dedicated to exposition, with the flick delving into every detail of Billy's childhood and Santa-related traumas. For an '80s slasher, it's rather commendable that writer Michael Hickey and director Charles E. Sellier Jr. were willing to use so much time setting up the characters before Billy's murderous rampage. Additionally, Sellier's direction is surprisingly accomplished, giving the picture a stark, grim feeling and infusing several scenes with genuine tension (even if the murder set-pieces are predictable). Nonetheless, Silent Night, Deadly Night takes itself a tad too seriously. Some scenes are unintentionally funny, but at other times the film goes through the ridiculous motions with such a straight face that it feels vile and callous instead of delightfully campy. Worse, the score is nails-on-a-chalkboard grating. Perhaps the film's biggest sin, though, is that it feels worthless and gutless; there's no intelligence or any sort of rationale behind the violence. One could contend that it comments on unnecessarily over-the-top disciplinary methods, but the film's treatment of this is entirely surface-level, as the nuns are painted in broad strokes of black and white as flat-out evil.


At least one can laugh at the idiocy of Silent Night, Deadly Night from time to time. For instance, when Billy is working as Santa at the toy store, he's clearly awkward and vindictive towards the children, but he goes through the day without a single complaint. Lulwhat? Added to this, a nun rings the toy store and finds out that Billy is playing Santa, but doesn't bother to warn anyone about the potential dangers of this...she just hangs up the phone and heads to her car. Good thinking. And what would a slasher be without dumb murder victims? A policeman guarding the local orphanage decides to sweep the outside of the building (instead of doing any, you know, actual guarding), making himself a prime target. His police tactics are laughable in every respect here. And the nuns don't even bother to lock the front door of the orphanage despite firmly believing that Billy is on his way.

Ultimately, slashers like Silent Night, Deadly Night are pretty much critic-proof, because they have their niche audience who'll enjoy the movie regardless of how forgettable, conventional and unremarkable it is. And hey, this sleazy flick is sporadically enjoyable. Nevertheless, this premise should have been done better, as the flick generates an aura of sadism more often than one of schlocky glee, leading to unmistakable banality.

4.8/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Too scattershot...

Posted : 13 years ago on 3 December 2011 06:26 (A review of Arthur Christmas)

"A child's been missed!"

Making a genuinely good, original Christmas movie is a difficult task in this day and age. Added to this, after Fred Claus, The Polar Express, The Santa Clause and other such motion pictures, it seems impossible to put another fresh spin on Santa Claus and his North Pole universe. Enter the British animation studio Aardman (best known for Wallace and Gromit), whose CG-animated Arthur Christmas presents another unique interpretation of Santa's behind-the-scenes operations. Directed and co-written by Sarah Smith, this is a movie which eschews typical Christmas movie values to focus on a story concerning the obligation to provide gifts for all the boys and girls of the world. Added to this, its deconstruction of the Santa myth is genuinely original, as the annual present run is shown to be result of militaristic, Mission: Impossible-style tactics courtesy of jolly Saint Nick and his elite team of elves. Arthur Christmas definitely should have been tighter, but the elements which count were done well: there's charm, visual wit, heart, and even some valuable messages.



While Santa Claus (Broadbent) is busy delivering presents around the globe, his eldest son Steve (Laurie) oversees Christmas operations from a control room, assisting the holiday routine with 21st Century technology as he prepares for his impending Santa debut. Meanwhile, Santa's other son Arthur (McAvoy) spends his time in the mail room reading and answering letters from the children around the world. Unfortunately, amidst the frantic Christmas Eve procedures, a glitch leaves one sole present undelivered. Arthur is mortified at the notion of a child being left without a gift, but Steve is oddly comfortable about the loss. Hence, Arthur recruits the elderly, cynical Grandsanta (Nighy) and a plucky elf named Bryony (Jensen) to deliver the item and preserve Santa's integrity. Grandsanta unearths his retired sleigh and reindeer (these days a huge spacecraft is used), and they set out for England with a scant two hours left until sunrise and only a hazy idea of how to achieve their goal...

Aardman is predominantly recognised for their claymation techniques, most notably for Wallace and Gromit. But Arthur Christmas is a computer-animated feature, denoting the studio's second digital outing after 2006's Flushed Away. Retaining the plasticine charm of their earlier efforts, the animation here is somewhat of a hybrid of the old and the new. The backgrounds are remarkably detailed (the water effects are photorealistic), and the cinematography is far more dynamic than a stop motion animation feature would permit. But the design of the characters, while CGI, possess a clay figurine appearance, and wouldn't look out of place in a Wallace and Gromit adventure. There's a surplus of visual creativity to behold here, too, with sly background details that take multiple viewings to fully absorb. Additionally, several set-pieces throughout Arthur Christmas are excellent, including the hilariously enjoyable Christmas Eve operations and the nail-biting climax.



Unfortunately, despite its technical strengths, Arthur Christmas falters when it comes to the story's familial dynamics. The flick gets stuck in a serious rut during its midsection, and it meanders terribly; losing wit, ingenuity, and momentum as it sluggishly scrambles to deal with the laboured family dramatics and find a solution to its conventional plot obstacles. With Arthur's adventure having hit a serious hindrance, the focus is pulled away from him in order to concentrate on dramas within the house of Claus, but none of this stuff is engaging enough to sustain the portion of the runtime that it was allotted. As a result, there's an uncomfortable section of at least 20 minutes when you can happily take a bathroom break and not miss anything important. It takes a while for Arthur Christmas to recover from this, but it thankfully hits the finish line on a satisfying note, bringing the story to an end with warmth and heart before leaving us with a side-splitting epilogue. Still, the flick as a whole doesn't quite gel. It wanted to be a heartfelt family saga rather than just a disposable Christmas adventure, but the dramatic elements are simply not as interesting as Arthur's idealism.

Fortunately, the buoyant vocal cast help bring life to the screenplay even at its drabbest. James McAvoy is ideal as the titular Arthur Christmas, giving the role tremendous charm and believably making the character a lovable doofus. Well-known actors Jim Broadbent and Hugh Laurie also lend their voice talents to the ensemble, with Broadbent a perfect fit for Santa and Laurie almost unrecognisable as Steve (a role oddly reminiscent of Avatar's Colonel Quatrich). The show-stealers, though, are Billy Nighy and Ashley Jensen as Grandsanta and Bryony the elf (respectively). Nighy is especially fantastic; he clearly had an absolutely ball voicing the elderly curmudgeon who's dissatisfied with the technological overload of today's world. Jensen, meanwhile, is chipper and hasty, delivering her dialogue in an adorable Scottish brogue that makes her an utter joy whenever she's onscreen.



While Arthur Christmas lacks the emotion and maturity of a Pixar production, the story is underlined by a timely message: technology may be useful and fun, but it's pointless and vapid without a human touch. At the end of the day, though, Arthur Christmas is disappointingly scattershot, and it's not the instant Christmas classic it should have been. The picture's second act is a laboured, tedious bore, though this material is bookended by two acts brimming with heart, charm, excitement and imagination.

5.8/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Enjoyable coming-of-age fable

Posted : 13 years, 1 month ago on 2 December 2011 03:28 (A review of Submarine)

"My mother is worried I have mental problems. I found a book about teenage paranoid delusions during a routine search of my parents' bedroom."


Adapted from the 2008 novel by Joe Dunthorne, Submarine is the feature-film debut for director Richard Ayoade. Ayoade has been somewhat of a British television comedy luminary over recent years, with appearances on shows like The IT Crowd and Garth Marenghi's Darkplace, the latter of which he directed and co-wrote. For his first film, Ayoade has predominantly eschewed his established form of comedy to concentrate more on poignant drama, rendering Submarine a shrewd drama-comedy about teen angst and the harsh realities of young love. While it does provide the occasional laugh, this is more of a quirky, almost arthouse-style fare. Suffice it to say, it's an acquired taste, but those who can tolerate the material may find this to be an enjoyable coming-of-age fable benefitting from a dry sense of humour and idiosyncratic visuals.



Oliver Tate (Roberts) is a 15-year-old from Wales with an active imagination. In his free time, he enjoys memorising new words in the dictionary and listening to music by French crooners, not to mention committing the occasional act of petty arson. As he endures the British school system of the late '80s, Oliver's parents hit a spot of marital trouble that's exasperated when Jill's first love, a psychic named Graham (Considine), moves into their neighbourhood. Panicking, Oliver starts working to keep his parents from splitting up, but the domestic trouble is nothing compared to his experiences with quirky classmate Jordana (Paige) who agrees to have a relationship with the naïve lad.


Split into three chapters that are bookended by a prologue and an epilogue, Submarine doesn't shy away from exploring the highs and lows of teenage love, not to mention the inanity of teen behaviour. Oliver wants to believe he's emotionally mature, but this is contradicted by his actions at times. For instance, he tries to remake Jordana in his own image by giving her books he enjoys and taking her to see The Passion of Joan of Arc. Additionally, Oliver tries to be wise while working to reconcile his parents' crumbling marriage, but his methods are juvenile. We're also given a glimpse into Oliver's psyche via constant narration and scenes depicting the protagonist's self-obsessed fantasies. Ayoade's love for cinema is on display from time to time as well, with Oliver's internal monologues discussing movie clichés and even predicting what a biopic of his life would be like. Pretty much the entire story is told from Oliver's perspective and is filtered through his viewpoint, allowing Submarine's visuals to say as much about Oliver's character as the actor playing him. Consequently, this is more than just an eccentric arthouse flick with nothing to say - it's a celebration of the idealism, brutality, innocence and stupidity of youth.



Guided with a sure directorial hand belying Ayoade's status as a first-time filmmaker, Submarine is a visually striking flick which impressively captures the time and place of Britain in the 1980s. Ayoade ostensibly borrowed from Wes Anderson's playbook for his mise-en-scène, with matter-of-fact shot construction, blocky chapter titles and dry humour. Ayoade also employed a variety of techniques to bring vivid life to Oliver's mind, though the flick's overriding atmosphere is grim and dank thanks to the constantly miserable weather. Meanwhile, the quirky, well-chosen soundtrack serves as a nice aural complement to the story. Narratively, the only flaw with Submarine is an out-of-place subplot that seems major but leads nowhere. Early in the story, Oliver feels guilty when he playfully taunts heavy-set girl Zoe (McCann) with a few classmates, causing the bully victim to transfer to another school. To atone for this, Oliver tries to contact Zoe through the school lunch lady, but the subplot is immediately dropped after this. There's no satisfying payoff to Zoe's story, and in the long run this stuff comes off as an unnecessary distraction. Admittedly, too, the pacing begins slowing down during the third act.


Craig Roberts is pitch-perfect as Oliver Tate, effortlessly selling the character's wild imagination, contrived maturity, and utter naïveté. Alongside Roberts, Yasmin Paige is a delightful presence, and her performance allows us to understand why Oliver would be so smitten with her. Paige's key strength is in her ability to simultaneously play merry and moody, and she's able to comes off as uniquely quirky without seeming forced. Then there's Paddy Considine (Dead Man's Shoes) in the supporting role of the insipid New Age mystic who poses a threat to the marriage of Oliver's parents. Considine is a frequent scene-stealer thanks to his high energy levels. Meanwhile, in more minor roles, Sally Hawkins and Noah Taylor are understated yet incredibly rich as Oliver's mother and father. Also keep an eye out for Ben Stiller, who executive produced the film and who has a quick cameo as an actor in a soap opera.



One could contend that Submarine is a paint-by-numbers coming-of-age tale, and that it ends on a very familiar note of hope. At the very least, though, the ending feels earned, and Ayoade refused to close the film on a completely blatant, artificial note. Submarine may not be a game changer, but it does give vibrant new life to an old story. Ayoade is definitely a filmmaking talent to keep your eye on.

7.1/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

The best A Christmas Carol film adaptation!

Posted : 13 years, 1 month ago on 2 December 2011 06:04 (A review of The Muppet Christmas Carol)

"Hello! Welcome to the Muppet Christmas Carol! I am here to tell the story."

Since its 1843 publication, Charles Dickens's A Christmas Carol has been done to death in countless films and television specials, to the extent that another rote movie adaptation seems superfluous without a unique spin. Enter 1992's The Muppet Christmas Carol, which adapts the well-known 19th-century novella in a unique and quirky style featuring Jim Henson's iconic Muppet characters. But instead of merely mocking or parodying the source material, director Brian Henson and screenwriter Jerry Juhl (The Muppet Show's head writer) work to create a sincere, faithful retelling with songs, laughs, heart, charm and plenty of Muppets, making for arguably the best adaptation of the story to date. The Muppet Christmas Carol was the first theatrical appearance of the Muppets since the death of their creator and key creative force, Jim Henson, in 1990. It was also the first big-screen appearance of these lovable creatures since 1984's mediocre Muppets Take Manhattan, an eight-year gap. Nevertheless, none of this negatively affects The Muppet Christmas Carol, as the resulting picture is tremendously assured, well-made, and agreeably paced.



Everyone knows the story of A Christmas Carol by now (and if you don't, shame on you), but here's a summary: in 19th-century London, miserable old curmudgeon Ebenezer Scrooge (Michael Caine) lives his life without a thought towards kindness, and hates the jolly generosity that the Christmas season represents. Scrooge's selfishness and lack of compassion literally haunt him on the evening of Christmas Eve, when the ghostly apparitions of his late business partners, Robert and Jacob Marley (portrayed by the inimitable balcony hecklers Statler and Waldorf), visit him. The pair warn Scrooge about the errors of his wicked ways and reveal what awaits him in the afterlife if he does not repent. Throughout the night, Scrooge receives visits from three further ghosts who take him on a journey through Christmases past, present, and yet to come, hoping to convince Scrooge to change his cantankerous ways.

The likes of Kermit the Frog (Steve Whitmire), Miss Piggy (Frank Oz), Fozzie Bear (also Frank Oz), the Swedish Chef (David Rudman) and many other Muppets show up throughout The Muppet Christmas Carol to portray various characters from Dickens's story. The Muppets roam free here to provide fun humour, lighten up the proceedings (without cheapening the story), and inject their personalities into their roles, allowing this version to stand out from the hundreds of other Christmas Carol adaptations. The inclusion of Muppets renders the tale and its messages digestible to children who will likely receive their introduction to A Christmas Carol via this film. Also on the sidelines during the proceedings is the narrator, Charles Dickens - played by Gonzo (Dave Goelz) - and his friend, Rizzo the Rat (Steve Whitmire). The two beloved characters narrate the story, injecting commentary, discussions and comedic relief. However, the film does not overuse the device, as the characters artfully step aside at key points in the narrative, most notably for the grim scenes involving the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come. Consequently, the film gets dark at times, reinforcing that this is a genuine retelling of the story instead of a silly parody.



In addition to its healthy sense of humour, The Muppet Christmas Carol is a musical containing several delightful song and dance numbers. With Paul Williams writing the songs (after working on 1979's The Muppet Movie and earning an Academy Award nomination for The Rainbow Connection), several tunes here are true keepers, and the soundtrack is frequently played during the festive season in this reviewer's household. One More Sleep 'til Christmas is an early musical standout, as it embodies the community spirit of jubilance and excitement on Christmas Eve. It Feels Like Christmas is another notably excellent track that effortlessly encapsulates the festive season's essence and makes you smile. Additionally, the finale is all the more heartwarming and touching with the accompanying song entitled When Love Is Found. Also worth noting is Miles Goodman's accompanying score, which is joyously Yuletide-soaked when it needs to be and suitably intense in other scenes. For the film's theatrical release, Disney demanded the removal of the song When Love Is Gone (sung by Meredith Braun as Scrooge's former love, Belle), though an extended edition featuring the excised track later appeared on VHS and LaserDisc. Fans are split on their preferred version of the movie, with Brian Henson believing that When Love Is Gone is essential and some fans refusing to buy DVD or Blu-ray releases without the song. Although the narrative feels more complete with the song's inclusion, it does noticeably slow the pacing due to its sombre tone, starkly contrasting with the movie's cheery, upbeat, festive-soaked original songs.

Michael Caine plays the iconic role of Ebenezer Scrooge with utmost sincerity, treating the material like a Shakespearean drama instead of a Muppet production. Indeed, despite starring alongside the Muppets, he treats his co-stars as actual actors, in turn bringing a sense of emotion and earnestness that is rarely seen in Muppet films or Christmas comedies in general. Caine nails Scrooge's chilling callousness in the film's early scenes and convincingly undergoes a steady transformation by interacting with the three spirits on Christmas night, exuding believable warmth after making the all-important turn. It is refreshing to witness a dramatic actor of Caine's immense calibre in what could have been a throwaway comedic role, and the thespian's portrayal of Scrooge is up there with George C. Scott and Alastair Sim's interpretations of the legendary miser. Meanwhile, the voice cast is just as good as Caine (in their own way, that is). The Muppet Christmas Carol is the first Muppet movie not to feature Jim Henson as Kermit the Frog, as Steve Whitmire took over the role of Kermit after the legendary puppeteer's unfortunate death. Luckily, the transition is commendably seamless, with Whitmire presenting a new take on Kermit that would continue until his removal from The Muppets Studios in 2016. Miraculously, even though Juhl's screenplay includes much of the text's dry original dialogue, the movie is perpetually engaging thanks to the lively performances. Technical contributions across the board are likewise superb, with authentic-looking sets and vibrant cinematography. With director of photography John Fenner (1990's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) capturing the picture on 35mm celluloid, it looks like a proper film and carries strong visual gravitas.



Since The Muppet Christmas Carol keeps the source intact, the film retains the original story's themes and messages about not taking things for granted, the importance of leaving a positive legacy, and how the passage of time brings loss and regret. The ruminations on loss were undoubtedly timely for the Muppets crew during the production of the film due to Jim Henson's passing, and the movie is a perfect tribute to the legendary puppeteer and filmmaker since The Muppet Christmas Carol serves to entertain children while teaching them real-world morals and values. Suddenly, one of the film's key messages about living life to its fullest and bringing joy to others carries unbearable emotional weight because it mirrors the lessons Jim taught his son, Brian. For lovers of Christmas movies or Muppet movies, or admirers of Dickens's writing, you cannot go wrong with The Muppet Christmas Carol. It is delightful viewing for the whole family due to its heart, humour, charm and wonderful songs. It's a welcome Christmas treat that deserves continued prominence as one of the most beloved festive movies and holiday film traditions of our time.

9.0/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

This campy concoction is awesome

Posted : 13 years, 1 month ago on 1 December 2011 07:40 (A review of Santa's Slay)

"Christmas is over when I say it's over!"

If Weird Al Yankovic's song The Night Santa Went Crazy were ever adapted as a motion picture, the result would look like 2005's Santa's Slay, a fun and unapologetically bad-taste Yuletide-themed black comedy slasher romp. Movies as silly and goofy as Santa's Slay do not often work, but the resultant flick works because it knows what kind of film it is and does not take itself seriously. From top to bottom, this campy, tongue-in-cheek concoction is awesome for those who enjoy this type of schlock. It has everything: a badass killer Santa, a smoking hot blonde (Lost's Emilie de Ravin), strippers, bare boobs, the brutal murder of Fran Drescher, a James Caan cameo, and even a killer reindeer running over a grandfather.


Santa's Slay is about Santa Claus (wrestler Bill Goldberg), but this incarnation of the character is not the jolly fat guy we know and adore. As it turns out, Santa is the son of Satan who lost a bet with one of God's angels, forcing him into spreading cheer and goodwill for a thousand years. The story takes place as the thousand-year bet ends, and Saint Nick is free to murder and mutilate as much as he desires. On December 25th, he arrives in the small township of Hell (yes, Hell), riding on a sleigh driven by his "hell-deer" beasts to decimate the local population. The task of stopping the homicidal Kris Kringle falls to Nicolas (Douglas Smith), his would-be girlfriend Mary (the aforementioned Emilie de Ravin), and his eccentric grandfather (Robert Culp), who knows all about Santa's dark origins.

Are you sick of clichéd dysfunctional family Christmas films like Surviving Christmas and Christmas with the Kranks? Writer-director David Steiman clearly is, and he instantly lets us know about this perspective by completely skewering the very concept of such Yuletide movies. In the first scene of Santa's Slay, a bickering family - played by recognisable actors James Caan (Elf), Rebecca Gayheart (Urban Legend), Chris Kattan (Saturday Night Live) and Fran Drescher (The Nanny) - gather around for a Christmas lunch, creating the impression that we might be in for another dysfunctional family Christmas film. But then Goldberg's ruthless, Satanic Santa Claus promptly comes down the chimney and viciously murders them all in overzealous, funny ways, signalling that this is another type of Christmas movie. Heck, Steiman even pokes fun at holiday specials like Rankin/Bass's Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer by illustrating Santa's history with a claymation sequence.


Despite the flick's obscure, low-budget, direct-to-video origins, Brett Ratner served as a producer on Santa's Slay. After writer-director Steiman worked as Ratner's personal assistant for several movies (including Red Dragon, Rush Hour 2 and The Family Man), this picture allowed Steiman to try his hand at actual filmmaking. Right off the bat, Steiman does a marvellous job, making it unfortunate that Steiman has not made another movie as of 2024. The tone of Santa's Slay is agreeably campy and light-hearted, and the filmmaking itself is rock-solid for such a budget production. The murders are ridiculously funny - Santa stabs someone with a menorah for crying out loud, and in another scene, Santa's sled runs an old lady off the road. This material is glorious. Steiman's script also deploys plenty of amusing one-liners (including a play on Santa exclaiming "Ho ho ho!") to supplement the picture's humorous lunacy. But the film is not perfect - the score by Henning Lohner is too cheap and chintzy, and the budget limitations are sometimes obvious. Indeed, one gets the sense that Steiman could have done more with a higher budget. Nevertheless, Santa's Slay is a fun movie, which is all that matters in the long run.

The notion of wrestlers becoming actors does not often work (see Hulk Hogan in Santa with Muscles...), but casting Bill Goldberg as Santa Claus here was a stroke of genius. Goldberg absolutely relishes the chance to play this role, delivering a suitably tongue-in-cheek performance as the normally cheerful Father Christmas. He is surprisingly adept with one-liners, too, and Goldberg's outfit is perhaps the most impressive retro Santa costume to ever appear in a motion picture. Meanwhile, the late great Robert Culp (instantly recognisable as the voice of Wallace Breen from Half-Life 2) looks to be having the time of his life as Nicolas's grandfather. However, in the role of Nicolas, Douglas Smith is the cast's weakest link, as he is underwhelming and wooden. At the other end of the spectrum, though, Australian actress Emilie de Ravin is terrific as Mary - she is gorgeous and appears in tune with the movie's goofy tone.


At its core, Santa's Slay is a genuinely clever take on Santa Claus and the Christmas myth, on top of just being a good fun movie. Ridiculously cheesy, briskly paced and brimming with off-kilter humour, this is great offbeat Christmastime viewing. Plus, it does not outstay its welcome, as it is mercifully brisk at a hair under 75 minutes. If cheerful Christmas movies are not your thing, this is the type of flick you should watch on Christmas Eve with beers and pizza, back-to-back with Bad Santa.

7.0/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Haunting visionary masterpiece

Posted : 13 years, 1 month ago on 30 November 2011 01:29 (A review of Black Death)

"The fumes of the dead are in the air like poison. The plague, more cruel and more pitiless than war, descended upon us. A pestilence, that would leave half of our kingdom dead. Where did it come from? What carried its germ. The priests told us it was God's punishment. For what sin? What commandment must we break that could earn this? No, we knew the truth. This was not God's work but devilry. Or witchcraft. But our task, to hunt down a demon, was God's cure."


Let's get this out of the way first: Black Death is not an enjoyable movie due to its bleak and unflinching depiction of the 14th Century. Be that as it may, it is a riveting, dramatic horror picture that's as brilliant as it is challenging. A medieval horror show from director Christopher Smith (Severance, Triangle) and screenwriter Dario Poloni (2006's Wilderness), Black Death represents many cinematic styles. The director himself describes the movie as a "men on a mission" yarn, and it is, but it is also far more than that - it is a melancholy character study and a religious thriller with profound, thought-provoking themes. Horrifying and haunting, Black Death uncompromisingly dissects fundamentalism while depicting the ghastly madness that occurred during one of humanity's darkest periods.



The story takes place in 1348. The bubonic plague is sweeping across Europe, ravaging villages and killing millions. Amid this, conflicted monk Osmund (Eddie Redmayne) secretly maintains a forbidden relationship with young villager Averill (Kimberly Nixon), weakening his allegiance to the church and disillusioning him. Word soon reaches Osmund's village about a remote community in the marsh that is unaffected by the plague, meaning that they found a cure or a necromancer using the occult has found a way to starve off the infection. A bishop envoy named Ulric (Sean Bean) and his team of medieval mercenaries plan to find this rumoured sanctuary, and they seek a guide through the plague-ravaged lands. Sensing a sign from God, Osmund volunteers his services as Ulric's guide.


Black Death is not a preposterous fantasy adventure like Season of the Witch or any similar CG-heavy production - it's a story about men brutally slaughtering other men. The violence is not exploitative, though, as it is required to portray this dark era accurately. Additionally, on top of being an unforgiving portrayal of gruesome violence, Black Death contains themes that Smith explores with noticeable density and maturity, posing thought-provoking questions regarding religion and faith. More pertinently, the film provocatively examines the insanity of the 14th Century, when the bubonic plague led to the killing of innocent people and accused witches without a fair trial. Furthermore, the movie shows how a civilised, fundamentally good person can become barbaric, unthinkingly hurting others after being permanently changed by a traumatic ordeal. Now, that is the stuff of horror.


Black Death is a slow-burner of a horror movie; it's in no rush to get anywhere as it provides a methodical journey through this harsh world. Nevertheless, it is gripping. Laden with detail, the 14th Century truly comes alive here, with era-specific costumes, detailed production design, and authentic-feeling locations thick in fog and mood. Filmed in Germany, the sprawling vistas and eerie forests lend an epic quality to Black Death, allowing the picture to feel like far more than the low-budget, almost straight-to-video flick that it is. Credit is also due to Sebastian Edschmid, whose cinematography is drenched in grittiness and looks washed-out to borderline monochromic proportions. At times, the hand-held photography is a bit too shaky, but otherwise, the movie features marvellous photography and editing. Christopher Smith is a competent helmer, too, orchestrating the brutality with a sure hand, and there is a constant, suffocating sense of dread throughout the picture that suits the material. To Smith's credit, he also leaves certain things to the imagination, allowing the gory sound effects to speak for themselves. After all, images that the human mind can conjure up are far more horrifying than anything that can be committed to celluloid.


Unfortunately, though, the characters are mostly only distinguishable due to their physical appearances rather than personality traits or actual names. Considering how richly drawn some of the central characters are, it's a shame that the supporting characters remain one-dimensional plot pawns. On a more positive note, however, the actors are all spot-on. Smith does not assemble an A-list cast, as this is a case of choosing the right actors regardless of bankability. Leading the ensemble is Sean Bean, who's brilliantly intimidating as Ulric, and who competently carries the weight of the film on his shoulders. Bean's intensity is particularly riveting. (As a side note, due to his imposing look and how he wields a sword, one can't help but evoke memories of Bean as Boromir in The Lord of the Rings.) Alongside Bean, as Osmund, Eddie Redmayne is ideal; he nails the various emotions and nuances the role requires. Elsewhere in the cast, recognisable actors like David Warner (Titanic) and Carice van Houten (2006's Black Book) make a great impression, and former Blackadder cast member Tim McInnerny effectively plays a village leader. Meanwhile, a sublime bunch of tough guys play Ulric's band of dangerous men, including John Lynch (In the Name of the Father), Andy Nyman (Severance), and Johnny Harris (RocknRolla), among others. They all fulfil their duties to a high standard.


Enthralling, well-made, and with impressive production values, Black Death is a haunting horror film that conveys a dark tale and provides a provocative look at the 14th Century. While it is more of a movie you admire than conventionally enjoy, it is hard to deny that this is an incredibly scary and intelligent flick. If you have the stomach for disturbing motion pictures and can appreciate meditative material, this visionary masterpiece is definitely worth watching.

8.5/10



2 comments, Reply to this entry

Essential viewing

Posted : 13 years, 1 month ago on 29 November 2011 06:17 (A review of Mean Creek)

"You know, when we graduate high school, and become doctors and lawyers and all that kind of stuff... what do you think it would be like?"


Jacob Aaron Estes spent years working on a screenplay for his debut feature film, and the result is 2004's Mean Creek; a multifaceted, deceptively straightforward spin on the coming-of-age genre. Both harrowing and emotionally devastating, writer-director Estes made the most of the scant $500,000 budget he had at his disposal, using candid writing and an astonishing cast of young unknowns to elevate what could've easily been a cheap retread of similar productions. Mean Creek is unflinching in its ugly examination of morality and the human condition, with a story that spotlights a handful of innocent children marching towards adulthood who are forced to confront tragic events. Estes refused to take the easy way out here, resulting in a sincere motion picture free of Hollywood artifice, shrill faux melodrama, sentimentality and out-of-place humour.



When overweight school bully George (Peck) brutally beats up young classmate Sam (Culkin), a plan is conjured up to teach the arrogant tyrant a lesson. Feeling uncomfortable about physically hurting George, Sam and his older brother Rocky (Morgan) look to humiliate Sam's attacker with help from two of Rocky's friends: the meek Clyde (Kelley), and the gung-go Marty (Mechlowicz). Under the guise of it being Sam's birthday, the plan involves bringing George on an afternoon boating trip along a local river. As George is eager to make friends, he happily agrees to the invitation, unaware of the plans which await him. Sam's crush Millie (Schroeder) also tags along for the boating trip. Unfortunately, the prank goes awry, and everyone involved becomes faced with the horrible reality of their actions.


What really works here is the way that writer-director Estes allows time for us to get to know George. Everyone is eager to condemn him but, as it turns out, George is not inherently bad; he's a complex, mentally troubled boy merely yearning for social acceptance. Several of the characters come to recognise George's innate humanity, and as the day unfolds they start to sympathise with him and have second thoughts about their impending prank. A less skilful filmmaker would have painted the characters in broad strokes of black and white, with George as a straight-up villain and Sam as just a victim. Estes, on the other hand (despite being the target of a verbally abusive bully in his youth), removed these blind designations to take viewers on a morally ambiguous saga where the line between right and wrong has been severely blurred. And once tragedy strikes, there are no easy solutions or answers. Who is to blame for the tragedy? Is there anyone to blame? More pertinently, the characters are faced with an uncomfortable moral dilemma for which each ostensible solution has huge drawbacks, so what should be done? As Mean Creek has a lot on its mind, it would've been difficult for Estes to devise a satisfying resolution. Unfortunately, the ending falls somewhat short; it wants to be deviously ambiguous, but seems more like a copout.



Estes' directorial style is decidedly non-flashy and almost documentary-esque. Shot on location in the Oregonian wilderness, Mean Creek was not coated in a thick layer of Hollywood polish; rather, the film's look is somewhat raw, exemplifying the picture's indie origins. Despite Estes' filmmaking inexperience (he had only directed one short film prior to Mean Creek), the movie feels as if it was puppeteered by a veteran. Heck, some Hollywood directors have been working for decades, but are no match for Estes' superb mise-en-scène and gift for compelling drama. Pacing is another of the director's strong suits. While the third act admittedly starts to drag, the middle act (i.e. the whole boating trip) is completely gripping and full of tension, culminating with a game of "truth or dare" that's riveting in its unpredictability. Credit is also due to Sharone Meir for the handsome cinematography, while composer tomandandy should be commended for his evocative score that underscores the sense of tension and tragedy as a fun afternoon gives way to disaster and despair.


With no exceptions, the six leading actors are outstanding; easily one of the most talented young ensembles in years. As Sam, Rory Culkin (who, yes, does remind you of his big brother Macaulay) is amazing - the youthful performer was able to convey sadness and vulnerability, not to mention anxiety. Unexpectedly, Lizzie Maguire regular Carly Schroeder is perhaps the most nuanced cast-member (though this statement in no way belittles her excellent co-stars). Playing Sam's would-be girlfriend Millie, the cute Schroeder convincingly sells every aspect of her character, whose innocence gives way to a wider array of emotions. Mega props is also due to Nickelodeon favourite Josh Peck, who was given the difficult task of humanising the role of George. Peck was called upon to sell both humanity and brutality; a feat that he pulled off remarkably. Alongside them, Scott Mechlowicz is frightening and incredibly convincing as Marty, while Ryan Kelley and Trevor Morgan lend strong support playing Clyde and Rocky. It's a big ensemble, to be sure, but every actor shines, and each were given moments to make their roles three-dimensional.



Mean Creek was an official selection at both the Cannes and Sundance film festivals, and it's not hard to see why. Low-budget independent movies are often perceived as a source of intelligence, boldness and originality lacking in big dumb Hollywood blockbusters, and Mean Creek gives further credence to this belief. Even despite a few minor faults, this is essential viewing.

8.5/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry