Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (1612) - TV Shows (38) - DVDs (2)

Enjoyable romp with heart and laughs

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 8 December 2011 05:57 (A review of The Inbetweeners Movie)

"You better bring your wellies because you'll be knee-deep in clunge."

A beloved sitcom making the leap to a feature-length film is always a challenging proposition, and it does not always work. Fortunately, in the case of 2011's The Inbetweeners Movie, the transition from the small screen to the big screen is, for the most part, a smooth one. Puppeteered by veterans of the original series, including director Ben Palmer and writers Iain Morris and Damon Beesley, The Inbetweeners Movie has all the witty laughs and crude humour that made the show such a hit in the first place, and it introduces unforced depth to ensure that it does not merely feel like a few episodes stitched together. Maturity in a vulgar comedy is a feat that is worth celebrating, but it is even better that it was achieved in the movie adaptation of a beloved TV program. Best of all, while familiarity with the original show is preferred since you will have a better sense of what is at stake, it is likely that Inbetweeners virgins will be equally satisfied with this wholly enjoyable comedic romp beset with heart and side-splitting laughs.


With their school years finally coming to a close, Will (Simon Bird), Simon (Joe Thomas), Jay (James Buckley) and Neil (Blake Harrison) finish their A-levels and prepare to leave Rudge Park Comprehensive to start the next chapter of their lives, including University and full-time work. However, Simon's girlfriend and long-time crush, Carli (Emily Head), breaks up with Simon due to the uncertainty of their impending years of tertiary education, leaving him heartbroken and devastated. To help Simon get over his depression and to celebrate the end of school, the four decide to go on a "lads holiday" together in Malia, Crete, for a fortnight of relaxation, booze, girls and (hopefully) sex. Not long after their arrival, the troupe encounter a group of females with whom they strike up a tentative bond. Unfortunately, though, Carli is also holidaying in Malia with her friends, and Simon is still besotted with his ex, harbouring delusions that they can still patch things up and get back together.

Although some film adaptations feel fundamentally different to their television counterparts, The Inbetweeners Movie carries the same verve and style as the sitcom (right down to Will providing occasional voiceovers) while adding a layer of theatrical polish. With filming taking place in many of the same locations as the show, there is a comforting feeling of familiarity, making this an organic companion piece to the series. Additionally, with Morris and Beesley beginning work on the script before writing the show's third season, The Inbetweeners Movie tells a worthwhile story that follows on from the events of the series. In other words, it is not a forced, redundant continuation. Coming-of-age tales are not uncommon, but we do not often see this type of story that involves patiently developed characters we have come to know and love over several years. While the narrative is somewhat generic, the filmmakers at least handle it with sincerity, and it is rewarding to see this foursome at long last growing up after three seasons of pure immaturity. Thus, their character arcs (although predictable) feel more earned and emotionally satisfying. Additionally, writers Morris and Beesley have the good sense to not treat the story's female characters as mere eye candy or perfunctory plot pawns; instead, they have depth and feelings, adding mirth and emotional intrigue.



The popularity of The Inbetweeners endures because the show displays an astute understanding of the teenage mindset. Thankfully, Morris and Beesley carry these qualities to this feature film, with razor-sharp dialogue and hilarious observations about teen behaviour. Additionally, sending the boys to an island in Greece via a cheap holiday package gives the writers new targets for their humour (including flight delays, grungy accommodation, sleazy holidays representatives, nightclub entrance scams, etc.) while also allowing the boys to do what they do best: drinking alcohol, stripping naked, vomiting, farting, saying the wrong things, and trying their hardest to get girls but failing hilariously. Nevertheless, The Inbetweeners Movie falls short of perfection. There are copious moments of greatness, but the film sometimes does drag, especially in the third act. The plot feels somewhat bloated, diminishing some of the franchise's trademark punch.

Expectedly, all the actors here seem entirely at ease with their characters at this point. Leading the pack is Simon Bird, who perfectly sells the social awkwardness shtick in the role of Will. Like the show, Bird narrates the story, and his spot-on delivery, coupled with the witty writing, makes for several moments of inspired hilarity. On top of this, Bird also shines in the more tender moments, such as when he nervously watches his dalliance undress on a beach. The rest of the boys are equally good; they genuinely inhabit their roles, share remarkable chemistry, and effortlessly alternate between the dramatic and the hilarious. In particular, James Buckley routinely steals the show with his vulgar, rapid-fire one-liners that are an endless source of amusement. The performers are also surprisingly versatile, and their efforts here should serve as a springboard for bigger and better things post-Inbetweeners. Meanwhile, the female ensemble - consisting of Laura Haddock, Emily Head, Tamla Kari, Jessica Knappet and Lydia Rose Bewley - keeps up with the boys every step of the way, placing forth strong performances with ideal comic timing. Also of note in the cast is Greg Davies as series regular Mr. Gilbert, who threatens to steal the entire movie with an opening rant that had this humble reviewer in tears of laughter. It is a bit of a shame, then, that Davies disappears from the film immediately following his uproarious tirade.



The thing about The Inbetweeners as a franchise is that the creators wanted to wrap it up while it was still brilliant instead of milking it to exhaustion and risk sacrificing the show's overall integrity. Now that the boys have finished school and seem poised for a bright future, the creators can now safely put the franchise and these characters to bed. Thus, the conclusion to The Inbetweeners Movie feels weighty and poignant, as the foursome are about to head to University and will most likely start to grow apart. Sure, the ending is a bit sappy, but it feels earned; these boys have been through so many humiliations and failures, so they deserve an optimistic ending. Unfortunately, despite no initial plans for further Inbetweeners content, a follow-up film, The Inbetweeners 2, was released in 2014, which ruins many of this picture's story developments.

8.2/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Agonising...

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 7 December 2011 02:41 (A review of Lady Magdalene's)

"Hey, I work for the IRS. Who doesn't trust the IRS?"


The primary creative force behind Lady Magdalene's, J. Neil Schulman, may be somewhat of a successful novelist, but he cannot in good conscience add filmmaking to his list of credentials. While Schulman wants you to believe that Lady Magdalene's is a smart action-comedy satirising today's post-9/11 climate, the resulting picture is an agonising catastrophe; it's a two-hour black hole of tedium from which absolutely no joy can escape. This is not a case of "so bad it's good" like Plan 9 From Outer Space or The Room - instead, Schulman's movie is so bad that it's just really, really bad. As of December 2011, Lady Magdalene's has not been picked up for major distribution. The closest thing to distribution that Schulman could manage was an endorsement from a shady meal supplement company and uploading the rancid movie to YouTube. If that's not a red flag about the movie's quality, I don't know what is.


After IRS agent Jack Goldwater (Ethan Keogh) is humiliated when he tries to detain a suspicious-looking Arab-American on a plane, he is relieved of his Federal Air Marshal duties and busted down to an embarrassing desk job. Jack's assignment is to take control of a Nevada brothel run by Lady Magdalene, a.k.a. Maggie (Nichelle Nichols). As Jack begins to settle in, one of the prostitutes is murdered, triggering an investigation. The murder raises suspicion with Jack, in particular, who soon finds out that it may be tied to a larger terrorist threat to the entire nation.

The technical shortcomings of Lady Magdalene's stick out the most - a sense of amateurism hangs over this frequently ugly-looking film. However, perhaps the term "amateurish" is a bit too flattering since YouTube filmmakers can produce superior movies. Cinematographer Scott MacDonald should never be allowed to work again - various shots throughout the film are too overexposed, blending skin tones with rocks or walls. Additionally, the camera is often shaky for no rhyme or reason, while the framing reveals that the camera operators must have an exceedingly poor grasp of such essential principles as headroom and looking room. It seems the filmmakers also fail to realise that abrupt zooms look incredibly unprofessional. There is absolutely no style or sense of visual flair here. The action is meant to be exciting, yet even parody movies like Hot Shots! have better action. The comedy is intended to be funny, but the flick is obnoxiously laughless. And forget about it being "sexy"...


Lady Magdalene's was apparently produced for $500,000, but you wouldn't know it considering the drab colour scheme and incompetent special effects. The green-screening and digital compositing are notoriously bad, especially during driving scenes. For fuck's sake, rear projection techniques in the '50s look positively immaculate compared to the green-screening here. Compounding this awfulness, the editing is often harsh and jarring, while the sound mixing is pure amateur hour - for instance, ringtones are not properly integrated into the environment, as they sound like a piece of the score added in post-production. Speaking of the soundtrack, the music is often overbearing, grating and inappropriate; Daniel May's compositions would be better suited for a fucking elevator. Of course, technically inferior films can still be entertaining, but Schulman provides absolutely nothing as compensation for his shoddy filmmaking. Lady Magdalene's is poorly-paced, and Schulman has absolutely no understanding of comic timing. Admittedly, a few moments have comedic potential, but the delivery is way off. (The James Bond references are cringe-worthy.) For the most part, the dialogue is tin-eared as well. Nothing ever engages you at any point during the picture's unbearably prolonged 120-minute runtime.

J. Neil Schulman is an untalented hack, not a filmmaker in any sense of the word. The main problem with Lady Magdalene's is the lack of authority that permeates the picture. In great films like The Godfather, every frame feels puppeteered by a director who is in control of his movie. In Lady Magdalene's, scenes routinely unfold in an undisciplined manner, as if Schulman filmed a single take of every slate because he didn't feel comfortable giving his performers strong direction. Schulman's staging and mise-en-scène are often poor, as well - take, for example, a fight in a brothel that literally looks as if Schulman filmed a lackadaisical first rehearsal and called it a day. Fucking hell, even firearm techniques are lax, with performers wandering around half-heartedly brandishing their guns even though their characters are meant to be professionals. Exacerbating this is a facepalm-inducing instance of product placement, as a character reads director Schulman's own book, Escape from Heaven, in one scene. The sense of narcissism is overpowering. We get it, Neil: you love yourself.


Amidst all this is a cast one can't help but pity. Former Star Trek regular Nichelle Nichols is the most seasoned and professional actor in the cast, but she overdoes her performance as the titular Lady Magdalene, and it looks like she is mugging the camera. Ethan Keogh and Mark Gilvary are the only ones who show a degree of potential here, with Keogh emitting genuine charm and Gilvary scoring the only laughs in the entire picture (one of which is an outtake, mind you). These two aren't perfect, though - Keogh seems frequently bored, and his comedic delivery is flat, while Gilvary's performance is in dire need of discipline since he sometimes rambles. The rest of the actors range from unbelievably bad to merely serviceable. Even writer-director Schulman himself waddles into the frame to play a role, placing forth a performance dripping with unearned egotism and repulsive overconfidence. Schulman spouts his lines with a knowing wink as if to imply that he believes his writing is the pinnacle of excellence.

Somewhere inside Lady Magdalene's is a promising idea for an action-comedy, but the potential is utterly wasted in the hands of J. Neil Schulman. The script is slipshod, the cinematic techniques bring shame to the term "cinematic technique", and the actors often look bored out of their minds. Great films put us under a spell and engage our attention, but during Lady Magdalene's, you'll be left struggling to accept the poor filmmaking and desperately trying to endure the awfulness with your sanity intact. And then, just when you think it's over (and fucking hope it's over, for the sake of your well-being), there's an entirely superfluous 20-minute end credit reel consisting of a few music videos (I think?), outtakes (again, I think?), and maybe some deleted scenes, or something? All of this malarkey only serves to prolong the agonising experience of Lady Magdalene's and remind you that you have just wasted precious hours of your life you will never get back. I'd rather do time in Guantanamo Bay than watch this travesty again. Don't quit your day job, Neil.

0.5/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A tremendously funny festive black comedy

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 6 December 2011 07:54 (A review of The Ref )

"Do you know what this family needs? A mute."

The Ref was released by Walt Disney Studios subsidiary Buena Vista in 1994, but it is not the type of Christmastime entertainment that one would expect from the House of Mouse. By no means family-friendly, The Ref is a dark, mean-spirited, cynical and viciously funny black comedy crime film that does not aspire to generate warmth or fuzziness. Consequently, despite the festive setting, the distributor eschewed a customary Christmas release slot, instead electing to open the movie in March, where it significantly underperformed but later developed a cult following through home video and television airings. A darkly humorous "alternative" Christmas movie, The Ref works thanks to a combination of exceptional performances and the razor-sharp, top-notch screenplay by Richard LaGravenese and Marie Weiss, while Ted Demme's astute direction assuredly guides the material.



A troubled couple undergoing marriage counselling, Lloyd (Kevin Spacey) and Caroline (Judy Davis) constantly fight and bicker, with divorce seemingly a likely outcome. It is Christmas Eve, and nothing but gloom lies ahead for the pair, who will soon welcome their highly dysfunctional extended family. Elsewhere in town, cat burglar Gus (Denis Leary) is on the run from local police after a failed attempt to rob an affluent mansion. With the police setting up roadblocks, Gus takes hostages - and, unfortunately for him, he chooses Lloyd and Caroline. Bad choice. Although Gus should be in control since he has a gun, the thief soon finds himself in an intolerable situation as the couple fiercely argue into the night. Further complicating the situation is the unexpected presence of Lloyd and Caroline's son, Jesse (Robert J. Steinmiller Jr.), while Lloyd's family are still en route to the house to celebrate Christmas. Trying to weather the storm, Gus poses as Lloyd and Caroline's therapist in front of their family while the police expand their search.

A dark comedy inhabited by unlikeable and morally questionable individuals, The Ref is an agreeable reprieve from feel-good, saccharine-coated, family-friendly Christmas pictures. In the vein of National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation, the movie explores dysfunctional family dynamics and the tensions between families that normally remain hidden. Furthermore, the script takes satirical jabs at the typical, worthless presents that families often gift each other but everyone actually despises (socks, sweaters, and so on). Although The Ref is not necessarily a mature examination of the difficulties of marriage, the screenplay does effectively highlight the ridiculousness of some couples who launch into a full-blown argument over the most minor and insignificant things. Although the movie momentarily slips from the misanthropic to the sentimental as the final act kicks in, the tonal change feels somewhat earned, leading to an agreeably unconventional climax. Demme reshot the ending following negative test screenings, though the director later regretted the change. Your mileage may vary, but this reviewer believes the theatrical ending is fitting and satisfying.




The Ref features a uniformly excellent cast. Kevin Spacey (pre-downfall) and Judy Davis are ideal as Lloyd and Caroline, delivering their side-splitting dialogue with incredible zest and comedic energy. Their verbal sparring also possesses a nasty edge since they do not fight cutely; instead, they ferociously battle with tongues sharp enough to slice someone's fucking jugular. As long as you can overlook the recent allegations against Spacey, the actor is terrific here. Equally funny is stand-up comedian and MTV star Denis Leary, who worked with Demme on MTV spots and a Showtime comedy special. The Ref was Leary's first film project as the top-billed star, and he manages to make Gus both menacing and oddly likeable. With an almost unending supply of uproarious one-liners, Leary is a comedic delight here, and he also plays exceptionally well off his co-stars. In supporting roles, we have Glynis Johns (late of Mary Poppins) as Lloyd's big-mouthed monster of a mother (who even manages to draw Gus's ire), while the always-eccentric Christine Baranski often steals the spotlight as Lloyd's sister-in-law.

Aside from the cast, the dialogue is the flick's biggest asset. Bursting with razor-sharp, constantly hilarious and incisive dialogue, The Ref continually maintains interest as the actors deliver their witty lines with delightful relish. Late director Ted Demme (nephew of Oscar-nominated director Jonathan Demme) learned the filmmaking ropes at MTV, but he thankfully eschews flashy visual mannerisms here. Thus, The Ref is welcomely free of gimmicky filmmaking, and Demme perpetually keeps the narrative engaging through astute editing and the terrific performances. The Ref's only problem is that the material outside Lloyd and Caroline's household only occasionally works. While it is amusing to witness the incompetence of the bumbling police officers, and Raymond J. Barry is great as a police lieutenant, other material is less successful (Barry's character has a subplot involving infidelity and losing his job that ultimately leads nowhere).



With its perfect cast and uproarious screenplay, plus scenes with It's a Wonderful Life playing on the television, The Ref possesses all the earmarks of a genuine Christmas classic, making it unsurprising that it is a Christmastime staple for many households despite its misanthropic tone. Ahead of its time with its cynical attitude towards Christmas, it is a great companion piece to 2003's Bad Santa, and a double feature of the two would make for excellent holiday viewing for those with a disdain for the festive season.

8.5/10



1 comments, Reply to this entry

A visual spectacle beyond belief

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 5 December 2011 02:19 (A review of Immortals)

"My mark...will be left on this world forever."

The marketing team for Immortals want you to believe that the picture is a cross between 300 and the recent Clash of the Titans remake, situating muscular, sword-wielding 300-esque heroes within an action-packed tale concerning Greek Gods and myths. The description is somewhat suitable, but such a comparison would be trivialising Immortals; a film that's brilliant enough to stand as its own unique specimen. Although it won't get any acclaim for its script or human factor, the visual style is what makes this flick such a keeper. Coming from perfectionist Indian filmmaker Tarsem Singh, Immortals is a genuine stunner of a visual feast and an enthralling cinematic experience. This is the kind of stuff we go to the cinemas to see!



The anarchic King Hyperion (Rourke) is looking to conquer mortal men, and begins searching for a God-like weapon known as the Epirus Bow to help him unleash the malevolent Titans. Hyperion achieving his goals would bring about mankind's destruction, as well as the end of the reign of Zeus (Evans) and his pantheon of Gods. After witnessing the desecration of his village and the death of his mother at the hands of Hyperion, skilled peasant Theseus (Cavill) vows revenge. As Hyperion rallies his troops, Theseus prepares for the battle of his life with assistance from thief Stavros (Dorff) and virgin oracle Phaedra (Pinto) whose visions imply that disaster is ahead.

Comparing Immortals to 300 on the basis of how it looks is unfair - Singh's film may share the same producers, but it's not much like Zach Snyder's earlier feature at all. Snyder set out to replicate the look and feel of a Frank Miller graphic novel, but Singh's visual style is inspired by ancient Baroque art (that is, sculptures and paintings which are exaggerated and ornately detailed to convey as much information as possible without words). The exact essence of Baroque has been captured by Tarsem and cinematographer Brendan Galvin, who have used phenomenal shot composition and a gorgeous colour scheme to communicate drama and chaos with minimal lines of dialogue. It's a truly masterful approach. After all, movies are a visual medium and, as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. Every nickel of Immortals' estimated $75 million budget is accounted for on the screen, with lavish costumes, highly-detailed sets, and plenty of digital effects which infinitely extend the film's scope. While blockbusters with a surplus of CGI usually fail to gel, the technique actually works here because the effects are solid and have weight and inertia, and it suits the aesthetic.



The narrative eventually culminates with a concluding act dedicated to action and warfare, with Hyperion charging the final stronghold of men and looking to breach the Titans' mountain prison. Immortals has isolated action beats throughout the first two acts that leave you breathless, but the climax is a spectacle beyond belief. Tarsem avoided the shaky-cam/rapid-fire editing approach which is notorious for turning action into an incomprehensible blur. Instead, the framing is often wide and sturdy, allowing us to enjoy the carnage and actually watch the terrific fight choreography. There is the occasional use of slow motion whenever the Gods are around due to their superhuman speed, but the technique is not frequent or distracting. If anything, there's not enough slo-mo, because there's so much violent awesomeness to see and so little time to properly absorb it. On this basis, Immortals deserves multiple viewings. Granted, it's difficult to get emotionally invested in the picture's story and characters, but it's also difficult to tear your eyes away from the screen because it's constantly bursting with rich, layered, enthralling imagery.

As Theseus, Henry Cavill (a.k.a. the new Superman in Zack Snyder's Man of Steel) admittedly has difficulties trying to act tough, but he's nevertheless sincere and earnest, and he has a likeable screen presence. (His work here is definitely better than Sam Worthington's performance in Clash of the Titans.) Meanwhile, it seems like Mickey Rourke had a grand old time chewing the scenery as the wicked King Hyperion. Mickey's performance affords the film a genuine sense of gravitas, and the star is not as underused here as he was in Iron Man 2. Digging into the supporting cast, a surprisingly ripped Stephen Dorff is solid as Stavros, while Freida Pinto was a good pick for the virgin oracle. Rounding out the cast is Luke Evans, who's terrific and intense as Zeus' God form.



Perhaps the biggest shortcoming of Immortals is the lingering sense that there should be more - more to the journey, more to the narrative, and more to the scope in general. It leaves you thinking that a bigger budget could have allowed for an extra 20 or 30 minutes of material to leave the film feeling truly epic. However, none of this implies that Immortals is unsatisfying. On the contrary, it's an almost instant classic, and it says something about the quality of the movie if your biggest criticism is that it leaves you wanting more of it. While Immortals fails to pack the emotional punch of 300 or Gladiator, this is a beautifully-rendered flick which delivers what it promised on the tin. In other words, if you're a joyless cynic you'll probably hate it, but if you can embrace the material and appreciate the choice of visual storytelling, you'll enjoy yourself immensely.

7.6/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

It's a Wonderful Movie!

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 5 December 2011 09:01 (A review of It's a Wonderful Life)

"Strange, isn't it? Each man's life touches so many other lives. When he isn't around he leaves an awful hole, doesn't he?"


A Christmastime staple, Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life is a rare film which has withstood the test of time and continues to touch millions of people through its themes, boundless appeal, and emotional power. Admittedly, compared to Miracle on 34th Street or National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation, It's a Wonderful Life is not exactly a Christmas film in the classical sense - after all, only the finale occurs on Christmas Eve, and the story has nothing to do with Santa Claus. Nevertheless, this film encapsulates the true spirit of the holiday: the value of family and friends, and the importance of giving rather than receiving. Furthermore, It's a Wonderful Life can be watched at any time of the year because of its feel-good themes as well as its potent message about the significance of a single human soul.


The story commences on Christmas Eve, with a chorus line of prayers originating from the small town of Bedford Falls pleading for the angels to aid the despairing George Bailey (James Stewart). The unsung hero of Bedford Falls, George aspired to travel the world and study at University, but was forced to relinquish his dreams to manage his late father's business to make sure it won't fall into the hands of wealthy schemer Mr Potter (Lionel Barrymore). George always acts in the interests of others, and in his adult life, he marries the beautiful Mary (Donna Reed) with whom he has four beautiful children. However, financial problems and personal issues suddenly mount, overwhelming George and plunging him into a tragic abyss of despair. Enter George's guardian angel Clarence (Henry Travers), who arrives from Heaven to heighten the depressed man's spirits. To achieve this end, Clarence shows George a vision of a world in which he never existed.

Flashbacks constitute the first two-thirds of It's a Wonderful Life, with Clarence learning about George's background and observing the events leading up to his suicide contemplation. Such a device is a structural masterstroke, as it allows viewers to see George's past alongside Clarence. Additionally, the script meticulously develops George's character while the knowledge of his depression sits at the back of our minds. Conveying an entire movie's worth of material, Capra accommodates the full breadth of George's life, treating it with the care it deserves. We become immersed in George's existence, and we fall in love with the man; it seems impossible that anything could threaten to destroy his life, or he could lose his temper. This brand of gentle, enthralling character development is gratifying and essential, letting us see what's at stake when Clarence at long last descends to earth to meet George. And since we grow to love George so much, the climax is all the more poignant (almost unbearably so).


It's a Wonderful Life is such an effective feel-good movie because it asserts the notion that everyone, regardless of how insignificant they may seem, can make a difference. The angels describe life as "God's greatest gift", and Capra delivers the message that worldly riches mean nothing compared to love, family, friends, honesty and integrity. This all culminates with a goosebump-inducing finale, which never fails to leave this reviewer a blubbering mess. Indeed, anybody who is not moved by the flick's final few minutes should wonder what is wrong with them. Additionally, It's a Wonderful Life is so often referred to as cheesy and sentimental, but it's also surprisingly dark at times. The lead-up to George's depression is heart-wrenching in its bleakness, and George's lurid odyssey through Pottersville - a community in which he was never born - contains traces of film noir, as it's realistically gloomy.

Capra makes the most of the estimated $3 million budget; It's a Wonderful Life is a technically impressive motion picture from top to bottom. The fictional town of Bedford Falls seems authentic, as the crew actually constructed an elaborate main street consisting of numerous buildings and stores; consequently, it feels like a lived-in town as opposed to a studio back-lot. Additionally, filming took place during summer months, necessitating the creation of artificial snow. Fake snow often fails to convince, but every flake of snow in It's a Wonderful Life looks genuine. Admittedly, there are a few technical issues, such as wide shots not precisely matching close-ups, or a shonky transition as Clarence disappears during a scuffle, but such shortcomings scarcely matter. Capra's pacing is magnificent, while the black & white, 35mm photography (courtesy of three credited cinematographers) bursts with visual flair. And although the film is vehemently a drama, gentle humour livens the proceedings from time to time, making the viewing experience even more delightful.


While Capra and his co-writers (Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett) deserve some of the recognition for It's a Wonderful Life's brilliance, Stewart's immaculate performance truly makes the film work. Stewart portrays George Bailey with a deft mixture of innocence and integrity, not to mention humanity and fallibility, which ensures viewers will root for him from the outset. Stewart fits the role like a glove - he's amiable and convincing, and his desperation and despair is increasingly apparent when he's submerged into the vision of Pottersville. Equally striking is Reed as George's wife, Mary. Reed was not Capra's first choice, but it's hard to imagine anyone else in the role, as she embodies the sweetness required to convincingly capture George's heart. Meanwhile, as George's guardian angel, Travers is utterly charming. The rest of the supporting cast is just as impressive - Barrymore emanates cunning and malice as the wicked Potter, while Thomas Mitchell makes for an endearing (albeit incompetent) Uncle Billy. Capra never allows a faulty acting moment to sneak into his masterpiece.

With It's a Wonderful Life's strong reputation and almost unanimous acclaim, it's difficult to believe that it was not a hit during its theatrical release. In addition to mixed reviews, the box office earnings were underwhelming, which doomed Capra's newly established production company, Liberty Films. It earned a few Academy Award nominations, but won nothing at the ceremony. Subsequently, It's a Wonderful Life fell into relative obscurity until the picture's copyright expired and it entered the public domain, meaning that television stations could play it ad nauseam without the need to pay royalties. Thus, it was used as a TV time-filler during the Christmas season, resulting in its rediscovery by a whole new generation. At last, decades later, the reviews were uniformly positive, and It's a Wonderful Life received the love and acclaim it always deserved. If It's a Wonderful Life was never created, the world would have been worse off for it.

"You see George, you've really had a wonderful life. Don't you see what a mistake it would be to just throw it away?"

10/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Sublimely engaging... The acting is excellent

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 4 December 2011 01:19 (A review of Notes on a Scandal)

"I hadn't been pursued like this for years... I knew it was wrong, and immoral, and completely ridiculous, but, I don't know. I just allowed it to happen."

Based on Zoe Heller's novel What Was She Thinking?, 2006's Notes on a Scandal is a drama-thriller in the mould of films like Fatal Attraction and Single White Female. It's a movie which burrows into the human psyche in order to explore the deepest, darkest recesses of obsession and loneliness. On top of this, Notes on a Scandal is very much an acting main event which brings together two of the greatest actresses of this generation - Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett - and pits them against one another. Suffice it to say, the resulting flick is sublimely engaging.



An elderly battle axe of a teaching veteran, Barbara Covett (Dench) enjoys writing in her diary on a constant basis, chronicling fantasies and experiences as she gossips for her own entertainment. Past the age of 70, Barbara is approaching retirement, and has become overly cynical and disenfranchised with today's youth and school system. Enter naïve new high school teacher Sheba Hart (Blanchett), whose idealistic aspirations exceed her abilities, and who has trouble fitting in with the experienced educators. Sheba finds a good, strong friend in Barbara, though, and the pair hit it off marvellously. However, Barbara soon witnesses Sheba having a sexual tryst with 15-year-old schoolboy Steven (Simpson). She agrees to protect the secret, but begins advising Sheba on what to do about the situation, all the while harbouring a more sinister agenda.

Notes on a Scandal is so effective thanks to its penchant for fascinating character psychology. With the narrative framed by voiceovers in the form of entries in Barbara's private journal, we are invited into Barbara's head from the very outset. On the surface Barbara seems like a sweet, frail old woman, but her acerbic internal thoughts provide an effective snapshot of her calculating mind that's overloaded with pretentious, unforgiving thoughts as she discusses her recent conquests and schemes. Barbara is the antagonist of the film of course, and your sympathies will likely be with Sheba due to how human she is, but Barbara is nevertheless fleshed-out and three-dimensional enough that you cannot flat-out label her as a bad person. Another strong suit of Notes on a Scandal is the dialogue, which is consistently engaging. Screenwriter Patrick Marber (who also wrote Closer) has done a phenomenal job of translating the book to the screen, leading to a much-deserved Oscar nomination.



Marber's script was magnificently brought to life by director Richard Eyre, whose efforts keep the film moving forward at a swift pace with literally no lags or boring patches. Sure, it'd be easy to craft a great movie with such a superlative script and this ensemble of fantastic performers, but it fell to Eyre to keep the film tight and disciplined; a task he fulfilled magnificently. Such luminosity extends to the Oscar-nominated score by Phillip Glass, which is permeated with layers of strings to add further dimension to the onscreen action. On a less positive note, though, Notes on a Scandal falters as it approaches the finish line. Writer Patrick Marber lightened up the tone of the ending of Heller's book, leading to a poor final scene that feels too mainstream-friendly. Ultimately, the conclusion does not match the story's potential, and it flames out on a note of "meh" rather than staying true to the dark emotional intensity preceding it.

At its heart, Notes on a Scandal is a masterclass of acting, with Judi Dench and Cate Blanchett perfectly bringing life to their flawed, multifaceted characters. Dench has consistently shown that she's a versatile actress, but here she manages to surprise us yet again. While the role asked for Dench to be cruel and callous, she also had to sell the character's vulnerability as well as Barbara's sweet old woman exterior. Remarkably, she pulled it off. This could be Dench's finest performance to date; she's a tour de force, tackling the role of Barbara as if it was tailored for her. Her work is deliciously rich as well, making multiple viewings absolutely essential in order to catch all of the nuances on display. Meanwhile, Cate Blanchett is a perfect acting foil for Dench. Enthralling and emotionally dense, Blanchett inhabits the role; you feel as if you're seeing Sheba instead of just Blanchett. Not to be overlooked, the often comically-oriented Bill Nighy proves here that he's a strong dramatic actor. His interactions with Sheba and his Down Syndrome-suffering son are perfectly naturalistic and convincing, and a scene discussing Sheba's schoolboy dalliance proves that Nighy can handle intensity and emotion.



Student-teacher relations are certainly a topical issue in this day and age. Such criminal offenses are alarmingly common, and each case often gets plenty of press. A very adult film, Notes on a Scandal tenderly explores these types of relationships within the context of a transfixing psychological thriller brimming with emotional intensity. Viewers expecting a Dench/Blanchett pair-up to play for more a conservative or mainstream audience are advised to take note of its subject matter before watching.

7.8/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Unmistakably banal and pointless

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 3 December 2011 01:03 (A review of Silent Night, Deadly Night)

"You see Santa Claus tonight you better run boy, you better run for ya life!"

Due to its premise concerning an axe-wielding serial killer dressed in a Santa Claus outfit, Silent Night, Deadly Night stirred up quite a ruckus when it hit cinema screens back in 1984. Most notably, renowned critics Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert positively detested it, calling the film both irresponsible towards the spirit of Christmas and morally reprehensible. Now a cult classic, Silent Night, Deadly Night is seriously flawed, but it nevertheless remains a somewhat enjoyable little slasher that does have its charms.


Opening on Christmas Eve in the 1970s, 5-year-old Billy is looking forward to receiving presents from his beloved Santa Claus. However, Billy's mentally disturbed grandfather (Hare) shatters his excitement and frightens the impressionable youth, warning Billy that Father Christmas will punish the naughty children. The lad's fear is only exacerbated when he subsequently witnesses his parents being brutally murdered by a man in a Santa costume. Following this, Billy and his little brother are sent to a Catholic orphanage where Billy's psychological trauma is worsened by the nuns' strictness. Fast forward 10 years, and Billy (Wilson) is a productive member of society with a job at a local toy store. But when Christmas season approaches, Billy's boss forces the traumatised boy to don a Santa outfit and act as the jolly big man. Things do not go well, however - Billy snaps, grabs an axe, and sets out to punish all the naughty boys and girls.

The entire first half of Silent Night, Deadly Night is dedicated to exposition, with the flick delving into every detail of Billy's childhood and Santa-related traumas. For an '80s slasher, it's rather commendable that writer Michael Hickey and director Charles E. Sellier Jr. were willing to use so much time setting up the characters before Billy's murderous rampage. Additionally, Sellier's direction is surprisingly accomplished, giving the picture a stark, grim feeling and infusing several scenes with genuine tension (even if the murder set-pieces are predictable). Nonetheless, Silent Night, Deadly Night takes itself a tad too seriously. Some scenes are unintentionally funny, but at other times the film goes through the ridiculous motions with such a straight face that it feels vile and callous instead of delightfully campy. Worse, the score is nails-on-a-chalkboard grating. Perhaps the film's biggest sin, though, is that it feels worthless and gutless; there's no intelligence or any sort of rationale behind the violence. One could contend that it comments on unnecessarily over-the-top disciplinary methods, but the film's treatment of this is entirely surface-level, as the nuns are painted in broad strokes of black and white as flat-out evil.


At least one can laugh at the idiocy of Silent Night, Deadly Night from time to time. For instance, when Billy is working as Santa at the toy store, he's clearly awkward and vindictive towards the children, but he goes through the day without a single complaint. Lulwhat? Added to this, a nun rings the toy store and finds out that Billy is playing Santa, but doesn't bother to warn anyone about the potential dangers of this...she just hangs up the phone and heads to her car. Good thinking. And what would a slasher be without dumb murder victims? A policeman guarding the local orphanage decides to sweep the outside of the building (instead of doing any, you know, actual guarding), making himself a prime target. His police tactics are laughable in every respect here. And the nuns don't even bother to lock the front door of the orphanage despite firmly believing that Billy is on his way.

Ultimately, slashers like Silent Night, Deadly Night are pretty much critic-proof, because they have their niche audience who'll enjoy the movie regardless of how forgettable, conventional and unremarkable it is. And hey, this sleazy flick is sporadically enjoyable. Nevertheless, this premise should have been done better, as the flick generates an aura of sadism more often than one of schlocky glee, leading to unmistakable banality.

4.8/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Too scattershot...

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 3 December 2011 06:26 (A review of Arthur Christmas)

"A child's been missed!"

Making a genuinely good, original Christmas movie is a difficult task in this day and age. Added to this, after Fred Claus, The Polar Express, The Santa Clause and other such motion pictures, it seems impossible to put another fresh spin on Santa Claus and his North Pole universe. Enter the British animation studio Aardman (best known for Wallace and Gromit), whose CG-animated Arthur Christmas presents another unique interpretation of Santa's behind-the-scenes operations. Directed and co-written by Sarah Smith, this is a movie which eschews typical Christmas movie values to focus on a story concerning the obligation to provide gifts for all the boys and girls of the world. Added to this, its deconstruction of the Santa myth is genuinely original, as the annual present run is shown to be result of militaristic, Mission: Impossible-style tactics courtesy of jolly Saint Nick and his elite team of elves. Arthur Christmas definitely should have been tighter, but the elements which count were done well: there's charm, visual wit, heart, and even some valuable messages.



While Santa Claus (Broadbent) is busy delivering presents around the globe, his eldest son Steve (Laurie) oversees Christmas operations from a control room, assisting the holiday routine with 21st Century technology as he prepares for his impending Santa debut. Meanwhile, Santa's other son Arthur (McAvoy) spends his time in the mail room reading and answering letters from the children around the world. Unfortunately, amidst the frantic Christmas Eve procedures, a glitch leaves one sole present undelivered. Arthur is mortified at the notion of a child being left without a gift, but Steve is oddly comfortable about the loss. Hence, Arthur recruits the elderly, cynical Grandsanta (Nighy) and a plucky elf named Bryony (Jensen) to deliver the item and preserve Santa's integrity. Grandsanta unearths his retired sleigh and reindeer (these days a huge spacecraft is used), and they set out for England with a scant two hours left until sunrise and only a hazy idea of how to achieve their goal...

Aardman is predominantly recognised for their claymation techniques, most notably for Wallace and Gromit. But Arthur Christmas is a computer-animated feature, denoting the studio's second digital outing after 2006's Flushed Away. Retaining the plasticine charm of their earlier efforts, the animation here is somewhat of a hybrid of the old and the new. The backgrounds are remarkably detailed (the water effects are photorealistic), and the cinematography is far more dynamic than a stop motion animation feature would permit. But the design of the characters, while CGI, possess a clay figurine appearance, and wouldn't look out of place in a Wallace and Gromit adventure. There's a surplus of visual creativity to behold here, too, with sly background details that take multiple viewings to fully absorb. Additionally, several set-pieces throughout Arthur Christmas are excellent, including the hilariously enjoyable Christmas Eve operations and the nail-biting climax.



Unfortunately, despite its technical strengths, Arthur Christmas falters when it comes to the story's familial dynamics. The flick gets stuck in a serious rut during its midsection, and it meanders terribly; losing wit, ingenuity, and momentum as it sluggishly scrambles to deal with the laboured family dramatics and find a solution to its conventional plot obstacles. With Arthur's adventure having hit a serious hindrance, the focus is pulled away from him in order to concentrate on dramas within the house of Claus, but none of this stuff is engaging enough to sustain the portion of the runtime that it was allotted. As a result, there's an uncomfortable section of at least 20 minutes when you can happily take a bathroom break and not miss anything important. It takes a while for Arthur Christmas to recover from this, but it thankfully hits the finish line on a satisfying note, bringing the story to an end with warmth and heart before leaving us with a side-splitting epilogue. Still, the flick as a whole doesn't quite gel. It wanted to be a heartfelt family saga rather than just a disposable Christmas adventure, but the dramatic elements are simply not as interesting as Arthur's idealism.

Fortunately, the buoyant vocal cast help bring life to the screenplay even at its drabbest. James McAvoy is ideal as the titular Arthur Christmas, giving the role tremendous charm and believably making the character a lovable doofus. Well-known actors Jim Broadbent and Hugh Laurie also lend their voice talents to the ensemble, with Broadbent a perfect fit for Santa and Laurie almost unrecognisable as Steve (a role oddly reminiscent of Avatar's Colonel Quatrich). The show-stealers, though, are Billy Nighy and Ashley Jensen as Grandsanta and Bryony the elf (respectively). Nighy is especially fantastic; he clearly had an absolutely ball voicing the elderly curmudgeon who's dissatisfied with the technological overload of today's world. Jensen, meanwhile, is chipper and hasty, delivering her dialogue in an adorable Scottish brogue that makes her an utter joy whenever she's onscreen.



While Arthur Christmas lacks the emotion and maturity of a Pixar production, the story is underlined by a timely message: technology may be useful and fun, but it's pointless and vapid without a human touch. At the end of the day, though, Arthur Christmas is disappointingly scattershot, and it's not the instant Christmas classic it should have been. The picture's second act is a laboured, tedious bore, though this material is bookended by two acts brimming with heart, charm, excitement and imagination.

5.8/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Enjoyable coming-of-age fable

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 2 December 2011 03:28 (A review of Submarine)

"My mother is worried I have mental problems. I found a book about teenage paranoid delusions during a routine search of my parents' bedroom."


Adapted from the 2008 novel by Joe Dunthorne, Submarine is the feature-film debut for director Richard Ayoade. Ayoade has been somewhat of a British television comedy luminary over recent years, with appearances on shows like The IT Crowd and Garth Marenghi's Darkplace, the latter of which he directed and co-wrote. For his first film, Ayoade has predominantly eschewed his established form of comedy to concentrate more on poignant drama, rendering Submarine a shrewd drama-comedy about teen angst and the harsh realities of young love. While it does provide the occasional laugh, this is more of a quirky, almost arthouse-style fare. Suffice it to say, it's an acquired taste, but those who can tolerate the material may find this to be an enjoyable coming-of-age fable benefitting from a dry sense of humour and idiosyncratic visuals.



Oliver Tate (Roberts) is a 15-year-old from Wales with an active imagination. In his free time, he enjoys memorising new words in the dictionary and listening to music by French crooners, not to mention committing the occasional act of petty arson. As he endures the British school system of the late '80s, Oliver's parents hit a spot of marital trouble that's exasperated when Jill's first love, a psychic named Graham (Considine), moves into their neighbourhood. Panicking, Oliver starts working to keep his parents from splitting up, but the domestic trouble is nothing compared to his experiences with quirky classmate Jordana (Paige) who agrees to have a relationship with the naïve lad.


Split into three chapters that are bookended by a prologue and an epilogue, Submarine doesn't shy away from exploring the highs and lows of teenage love, not to mention the inanity of teen behaviour. Oliver wants to believe he's emotionally mature, but this is contradicted by his actions at times. For instance, he tries to remake Jordana in his own image by giving her books he enjoys and taking her to see The Passion of Joan of Arc. Additionally, Oliver tries to be wise while working to reconcile his parents' crumbling marriage, but his methods are juvenile. We're also given a glimpse into Oliver's psyche via constant narration and scenes depicting the protagonist's self-obsessed fantasies. Ayoade's love for cinema is on display from time to time as well, with Oliver's internal monologues discussing movie clichés and even predicting what a biopic of his life would be like. Pretty much the entire story is told from Oliver's perspective and is filtered through his viewpoint, allowing Submarine's visuals to say as much about Oliver's character as the actor playing him. Consequently, this is more than just an eccentric arthouse flick with nothing to say - it's a celebration of the idealism, brutality, innocence and stupidity of youth.



Guided with a sure directorial hand belying Ayoade's status as a first-time filmmaker, Submarine is a visually striking flick which impressively captures the time and place of Britain in the 1980s. Ayoade ostensibly borrowed from Wes Anderson's playbook for his mise-en-scène, with matter-of-fact shot construction, blocky chapter titles and dry humour. Ayoade also employed a variety of techniques to bring vivid life to Oliver's mind, though the flick's overriding atmosphere is grim and dank thanks to the constantly miserable weather. Meanwhile, the quirky, well-chosen soundtrack serves as a nice aural complement to the story. Narratively, the only flaw with Submarine is an out-of-place subplot that seems major but leads nowhere. Early in the story, Oliver feels guilty when he playfully taunts heavy-set girl Zoe (McCann) with a few classmates, causing the bully victim to transfer to another school. To atone for this, Oliver tries to contact Zoe through the school lunch lady, but the subplot is immediately dropped after this. There's no satisfying payoff to Zoe's story, and in the long run this stuff comes off as an unnecessary distraction. Admittedly, too, the pacing begins slowing down during the third act.


Craig Roberts is pitch-perfect as Oliver Tate, effortlessly selling the character's wild imagination, contrived maturity, and utter naïveté. Alongside Roberts, Yasmin Paige is a delightful presence, and her performance allows us to understand why Oliver would be so smitten with her. Paige's key strength is in her ability to simultaneously play merry and moody, and she's able to comes off as uniquely quirky without seeming forced. Then there's Paddy Considine (Dead Man's Shoes) in the supporting role of the insipid New Age mystic who poses a threat to the marriage of Oliver's parents. Considine is a frequent scene-stealer thanks to his high energy levels. Meanwhile, in more minor roles, Sally Hawkins and Noah Taylor are understated yet incredibly rich as Oliver's mother and father. Also keep an eye out for Ben Stiller, who executive produced the film and who has a quick cameo as an actor in a soap opera.



One could contend that Submarine is a paint-by-numbers coming-of-age tale, and that it ends on a very familiar note of hope. At the very least, though, the ending feels earned, and Ayoade refused to close the film on a completely blatant, artificial note. Submarine may not be a game changer, but it does give vibrant new life to an old story. Ayoade is definitely a filmmaking talent to keep your eye on.

7.1/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry

The best A Christmas Carol film adaptation!

Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 2 December 2011 06:04 (A review of The Muppet Christmas Carol)

"Hello! Welcome to the Muppet Christmas Carol! I am here to tell the story."

Since its 1843 publication, Charles Dickens's A Christmas Carol has been done to death in countless films and television specials, to the extent that another rote movie adaptation seems superfluous without a unique spin. Enter 1992's The Muppet Christmas Carol, which adapts the well-known 19th-century novella in a unique and quirky style featuring Jim Henson's iconic Muppet characters. But instead of merely mocking or parodying the source material, director Brian Henson and screenwriter Jerry Juhl (The Muppet Show's head writer) work to create a sincere, faithful retelling with songs, laughs, heart, charm and plenty of Muppets, making for arguably the best adaptation of the story to date. The Muppet Christmas Carol was the first theatrical appearance of the Muppets since the death of their creator and key creative force, Jim Henson, in 1990. It was also the first big-screen appearance of these lovable creatures since 1984's mediocre Muppets Take Manhattan, an eight-year gap. Nevertheless, none of this negatively affects The Muppet Christmas Carol, as the resulting picture is tremendously assured, well-made, and agreeably paced.



Everyone knows the story of A Christmas Carol by now (and if you don't, shame on you), but here's a summary: in 19th-century London, miserable old curmudgeon Ebenezer Scrooge (Michael Caine) lives his life without a thought towards kindness, and hates the jolly generosity that the Christmas season represents. Scrooge's selfishness and lack of compassion literally haunt him on the evening of Christmas Eve, when the ghostly apparitions of his late business partners, Robert and Jacob Marley (portrayed by the inimitable balcony hecklers Statler and Waldorf), visit him. The pair warn Scrooge about the errors of his wicked ways and reveal what awaits him in the afterlife if he does not repent. Throughout the night, Scrooge receives visits from three further ghosts who take him on a journey through Christmases past, present, and yet to come, hoping to convince Scrooge to change his cantankerous ways.

The likes of Kermit the Frog (Steve Whitmire), Miss Piggy (Frank Oz), Fozzie Bear (also Frank Oz), the Swedish Chef (David Rudman) and many other Muppets show up throughout The Muppet Christmas Carol to portray various characters from Dickens's story. The Muppets roam free here to provide fun humour, lighten up the proceedings (without cheapening the story), and inject their personalities into their roles, allowing this version to stand out from the hundreds of other Christmas Carol adaptations. The inclusion of Muppets renders the tale and its messages digestible to children who will likely receive their introduction to A Christmas Carol via this film. Also on the sidelines during the proceedings is the narrator, Charles Dickens - played by Gonzo (Dave Goelz) - and his friend, Rizzo the Rat (Steve Whitmire). The two beloved characters narrate the story, injecting commentary, discussions and comedic relief. However, the film does not overuse the device, as the characters artfully step aside at key points in the narrative, most notably for the grim scenes involving the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come. Consequently, the film gets dark at times, reinforcing that this is a genuine retelling of the story instead of a silly parody.



In addition to its healthy sense of humour, The Muppet Christmas Carol is a musical containing several delightful song and dance numbers. With Paul Williams writing the songs (after working on 1979's The Muppet Movie and earning an Academy Award nomination for The Rainbow Connection), several tunes here are true keepers, and the soundtrack is frequently played during the festive season in this reviewer's household. One More Sleep 'til Christmas is an early musical standout, as it embodies the community spirit of jubilance and excitement on Christmas Eve. It Feels Like Christmas is another notably excellent track that effortlessly encapsulates the festive season's essence and makes you smile. Additionally, the finale is all the more heartwarming and touching with the accompanying song entitled When Love Is Found. Also worth noting is Miles Goodman's accompanying score, which is joyously Yuletide-soaked when it needs to be and suitably intense in other scenes. For the film's theatrical release, Disney demanded the removal of the song When Love Is Gone (sung by Meredith Braun as Scrooge's former love, Belle), though an extended edition featuring the excised track later appeared on VHS and LaserDisc. Fans are split on their preferred version of the movie, with Brian Henson believing that When Love Is Gone is essential and some fans refusing to buy DVD or Blu-ray releases without the song. Although the narrative feels more complete with the song's inclusion, it does noticeably slow the pacing due to its sombre tone, starkly contrasting with the movie's cheery, upbeat, festive-soaked original songs.

Michael Caine plays the iconic role of Ebenezer Scrooge with utmost sincerity, treating the material like a Shakespearean drama instead of a Muppet production. Indeed, despite starring alongside the Muppets, he treats his co-stars as actual actors, in turn bringing a sense of emotion and earnestness that is rarely seen in Muppet films or Christmas comedies in general. Caine nails Scrooge's chilling callousness in the film's early scenes and convincingly undergoes a steady transformation by interacting with the three spirits on Christmas night, exuding believable warmth after making the all-important turn. It is refreshing to witness a dramatic actor of Caine's immense calibre in what could have been a throwaway comedic role, and the thespian's portrayal of Scrooge is up there with George C. Scott and Alastair Sim's interpretations of the legendary miser. Meanwhile, the voice cast is just as good as Caine (in their own way, that is). The Muppet Christmas Carol is the first Muppet movie not to feature Jim Henson as Kermit the Frog, as Steve Whitmire took over the role of Kermit after the legendary puppeteer's unfortunate death. Luckily, the transition is commendably seamless, with Whitmire presenting a new take on Kermit that would continue until his removal from The Muppets Studios in 2016. Miraculously, even though Juhl's screenplay includes much of the text's dry original dialogue, the movie is perpetually engaging thanks to the lively performances. Technical contributions across the board are likewise superb, with authentic-looking sets and vibrant cinematography. With director of photography John Fenner (1990's Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) capturing the picture on 35mm celluloid, it looks like a proper film and carries strong visual gravitas.



Since The Muppet Christmas Carol keeps the source intact, the film retains the original story's themes and messages about not taking things for granted, the importance of leaving a positive legacy, and how the passage of time brings loss and regret. The ruminations on loss were undoubtedly timely for the Muppets crew during the production of the film due to Jim Henson's passing, and the movie is a perfect tribute to the legendary puppeteer and filmmaker since The Muppet Christmas Carol serves to entertain children while teaching them real-world morals and values. Suddenly, one of the film's key messages about living life to its fullest and bringing joy to others carries unbearable emotional weight because it mirrors the lessons Jim taught his son, Brian. For lovers of Christmas movies or Muppet movies, or admirers of Dickens's writing, you cannot go wrong with The Muppet Christmas Carol. It is delightful viewing for the whole family due to its heart, humour, charm and wonderful songs. It's a welcome Christmas treat that deserves continued prominence as one of the most beloved festive movies and holiday film traditions of our time.

9.0/10



0 comments, Reply to this entry