The final Spider-Man movie from director Sam Raimi, 2007's Spider-Man 3 is not the knockout trilogy capper the series deserves, with this third instalment receiving a far harsher critical reception than its superb predecessors. With three villains, a love triangle, and three times more story than it requires, Spider-Man 3 falls victim to the same overstuffing that marred movies like Batman & Robin and X-Men: The Last Stand, with Raimi sacrificing coherency and focus to jam as much into this threequel as possible. Upon its release in 2007, Spider-Man 3 received harsh criticism online, with many vocal commentators declaring the sequel among the worst films of all time. The overzealous and overstated denigration is unwarranted, as this third Spider-Man film is flawed, but it remains tremendously entertaining, and Raimi's competent craftsmanship mostly compensates for the narrative shortcomings. It is not perfect, but Spider-Man 3 is, at least, much better and more entertaining than several recent Marvel Cinematic Universe misfires.
After becoming a superhero and struggling to adjust to the complicated lifestyle, Peter Parker/Spider-Man (Tobey Maguire) is finally happy in life, maintaining a relationship with his dream girl, Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst), and enjoying adoration from the people of New York City. However, Peter's big head starts to upset Mary Jane, whose long-awaited Broadway debut ends in heartbreak. Further offending Mary Jane is Peter's classmate, Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard), who shares an upside-down kiss with Spider-Man during a festival honouring the web-slinger. Meanwhile, Peter's former best friend, Harry Osborn (James Franco), is still determined to avenge his father's death, and he uses leftover Green Goblin technology and performance-enhancing gas to become the New Goblin. A Daily Bugle rival also emerges in the form of aspiring photographer Eddie Brock (Topher Grace), who swoops in to provide pictures of Spider-Man, leading to editor-in-chief J. Jonah Jameson (J.K. Simmons) giving him a staff photographer job instead of Peter.
Additionally, escaped convict Flint Marko (Thomas Haden Church) wants money to support his sick daughter, Penny (Perla Haney-Jardine), but while running away from police, he falls into an experimental particle accelerator that turns him into the Sandman, as the machine fuses his body with the sand around him. Marko's escape also prompts Gwen's father, Captain George Stacy (James Cromwell), to inform Peter and Aunt May (Rosemary Harris) that the criminal was actually responsible for the death of Uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson). However, an even more significant threat emerges in the form of a black alien symbiote, which arrives in a meteor and promptly attaches itself to Peter. The parasitic substance poisons Peter's mind and enhances the dark parts of his personality, which moves him closer to destroying his life, reputation and personal relationships.
The first two acts of Spider-Man 3 are, for the most part, extremely strong, exhibiting the same type of storytelling patience and dramatic development that characterised the previous movies. Marko is a legitimately interesting villain, and his ties to Uncle Ben's death allow for emotional catharsis as Peter wrestles with his desire for vengeance and might finally be able to assuage his longstanding guilt. Alas, the troubles emerge in the third act when Marko disappears for an extended period, and Peter deals with the symbiote's impact on his personality. This section feels lifted from another film entirely, and the script paints Peter's downfall in extremely broad strokes, with cringe-worthy dancing and outwardly atrocious behaviour, birthing the internet's infamous "Bully Maguire" meme. The campiness and comedic value of these scenes are undeniable, but they lack the dramatic nuance of Raimi's previous Spider-Man pictures, which were humorous but still sincere. Unfortunately, Spider-Man 3 is only funny in an ironic sense. Raimi wanted two villains (Sandman and New Goblin), though he entertained the idea of adding Vulture to the mix, and only included Venom at the behest of producer Avi Arad. The seeds of an interesting story are here with Peter and Eddie's rivalry at the Daily Bugle, but Venom and the symbiote should be the focus of its own movie. Instead of feeling like a true adversary, Venom only feels like a third-act roadblock. Worse, the film fails to include the symbiote's voice, making the character feel like even more of a wasted opportunity.
Spider-Man 3 is detrimentally overstuffed, with the sequel introducing Eddie Brock, Gwen Stacy, Captain Stacy, and Flint Marko. Raimi's previous Spider-Man films each concentrated on a single villain, though the second movie also established Harry's villainous arc as he progressed towards becoming the New Goblin. However, Spider-Man 3 has three villains, and despite the picture's beefy 140-minute running time, it does not do justice to any of them. The tragedy is that Raimi nearly does justice to Sandman and New Goblin, while Peter's pre-symbiote storyline of him gradually losing Mary Jane through his arrogance and selfishness is genuinely engaging, but the throwaway addition of Venom ruins the narrative flow. Additionally, the film cuts away from characters like Marko and Brock for such long periods that viewers will likely forget about them. However, to the credit of Raimi and his co-writers (Spider-Man 2 scribe Alvin Sargent and Raimi's brother, Ivan), they manage to successfully pull all the story threads together for the climactic showdown as the three villains come together (one of whom teams up with Spider-Man) and Mary Jane's life hangs in the balance. The climax provides closure for all three villains, concludes the love triangle, and redeems Peter for his selfish actions.
With Spider-Man 3 working through so much story material, screenwriter Sargeant considered splitting the film into two parts, but he abandoned the idea when he could not successfully create an intermediate climax. A two-part movie might have alleviated some of the threequel's flaws while still permitting the climactic showdown with Sandman, Venom, and New Goblin. As it is, there is too much happening during the picture's 140-minute duration that it gives you whiplash as it shifts from one plotline to the next, and the result is not as emotional or soulful as the first two movies, despite the inherent poignancy of Sandman and Harry's stories.
Unfortunately, despite Raimi's talent for composing terrific dramatic scenes (see the touching scene as Peter talks to Aunt May about marriage), there are a few notably awful moments here. One egregious example is Captain Stacy and Eddie Brock nonchalantly talking while Gwen precariously hangs from the 62nd floor of a skyscraper, with Brock even taking the opportunity to reveal he is dating Gwen. Neither of them seems too concerned about the gravity or danger of the situation, making the scene feel startlingly forced and insincere. Later in the movie, Harry and Mary Jane dance the "twist" together like teenagers from the 1950s, a bizarre choice that feels contrived and self-indulgent. Another particularly awful sequence involves Peter attempting to make Mary Jane jealous at a jazz club when he arrives with Gwen. The events that unfold therein are uncomfortable and difficult to watch, even for die-hard comic fans, and it is the moment when Spider-Man 3 plunges directly into the toilet and struggles to recover.
Despite Spider-Man 3's immense problems, it remains an enthralling and fun blockbuster. Sony once again spared no expense in bringing the iconic web-slinger back to the big screen, with a reported budget of between $250-350 million, making it the most expensive film in history at the time. Unsurprisingly, the visuals are astonishing, with virtually photorealistic digital effects giving vivid life to Sandman and Venom, and Raimi delivers the goods with energy and gusto. The director confidently surpasses the previous two films in terms of scale and excitement, and Raimi's commitment to mixing CGI with practical effects and live-action elements creates a realistic, tangible aesthetic that ensures the set pieces are grounded and exhilarating despite the fantastical elements at play. Sony Pictures Imageworks spent two years creating the digital Sandman, developing computer programs from scratch to handle the complex, shape-shifting villain, and the resulting visual effects stand up to intense scrutiny nearly two decades later, surpassing most of the shonky CGI that appears in more recent blockbusters. Meanwhile, composer Christopher Young (Hellraiser, Ghost Rider) takes over from Danny Elfman here, though the score retains the existing iconic Spider-Man theme that continues to provoke exhilaration and emotion. However, despite a few memorable new motifs, Young's score is not as memorable or jubilant as Elfman's music.
Sandman is another top-notch villain, and Raimi does his utmost to turn Marko into a three-dimensional antagonist instead of the one-note villain that Venom winds up becoming. Marko is an escaped convict who only wants to care for his daughter and does not want to hurt anybody. He only turns against Spider-Man when the web-slinger provokes him, with Peter yearning for revenge and refusing to let Marko escape. However, it does strain credibility to breaking point that the criminal who becomes the Sandman has a personal connection to Peter. On that note, all three villains having a personal connection to Peter is ridiculous, and the issue would have persisted if Raimi made Spider-Man 4 with Dylan Baker's Dr. Curt Connors finally turning into the Lizard after appearing in Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3. Unfortunately, Topher Grace's portrayal of Eddie Brock/Venom is incredibly broad, with the performer struggling to act through the false teeth.
After years of playing the bumbling dork, Maguire relishes the opportunity to indulge in Peter's bad side, though the resulting performance is more befitting for a parody than a serious movie. With awful dance moves, a Goth combover, and an arsenal of one-liners ("I'm gonna put some dirt in your eye"), there is no nuance or believability to Maguire's portrayal of symbiote Peter. However, Maguire is superb in other scenes, demonstrating the same credible emotional depth that elevated his work in Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2. He is also an engaging and likable hero. Alongside him, Kirsten Dunst handles more dramatic material here and believably plays the conflicted Mary Jane, who finds Peter's selfish behaviour utterly disheartening and shows waning enthusiasm as she struggles to reconcile with their problems but falls apart when Harry forces her to end their relationship. Meanwhile, other returning members in the ensemble remain terrific, with James Franco convincingly portraying Harry's descent into villainy, Rosemary Harris once again bringing humanity and gravitas to the picture, and J.K. Simmons continuing to show he was born to play the outspoken J. Jonah Jameson. Spider-Man creator Stan Lee also turns up for another cameo appearance, of course, and actually has dialogue this time. Plus, Raimi brings back the indomitable Bruce Campbell for another uproarious cameo, this time playing a French maître d'. Also in the ensemble is Bryce Dallas Howard, who is promising but underused as Gwen Stacy, with her scenes merely intended to set up her appearances in future instalments that never happened.
While Spider-Man 2 received an extended cut on home video, Sony released an "Editor's Cut" of Spider-Man 3 in 2017 to commemorate the film's tenth anniversary and tie into the release of Spider-Man: Homecoming. The new version is shorter than the theatrical cut, taking away or trimming scenes while adding new and alternate material, plus Young's score is sometimes different. The Editor's Cut is a slight but noticeable improvement, with superior flow and a stronger motivation for Sandman, even if all the cringey symbiote behaviour remains. More deleted scenes reportedly exist that further flesh out Brock and Venom, but they remain unseen as of 2025.
Raimi cautiously approached the planned Spider-Man 4, hoping to redeem the series after this third picture, working through countless screenplay drafts with various writers as he tried to find something satisfactory, but to no avail. With Raimi unwilling to rush the production to meet Sony's 2011 release date, the filmmaker quit the picture, leading to 2012's rebooted The Amazing Spider-Man with a new cast and a worse creative direction. It is a genuine shame that Raimi did not get sufficient opportunity to make a sequel to compensate for the disappointment of Spider-Man 3, but at least this third film ends on a satisfying note, leaving no obvious loose ends and implying that Peter and Mary Jane might end up together. I cannot deny the movie's many flaws, but it is still a fine and perfectly watchable threequel with entertaining action sequences and superb visuals. Spider-Man 3 is not on the same level as its predecessors, but considering the intimidating quality of Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2, that would be a tall order.
6.7/10