Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
Avatar

PvtCaboose91

Add PvtCaboose91 as a friend


PvtCaboose91 will be notified and will have to accept this friendship request, to view updates from PvtCaboose91 and their ratings you must follow them.


Remove PvtCaboose91 as a friend


Follow PvtCaboose91

Follow content (Lists, pictures, videos, reviews & votes)

Track ratings in these areas:
Movies Music
TV shows Books
DVDs Games

About me

My name is Cal. I'm an independent filmmaker who runs the production company Expendable Films. You can check out my company's Vimeo page here: vimeo.com/expendablefilm
I've also made a list which details the movies I've made. You can check out my first feature, Unleashing the Demons, on Amazon Prime.

People may wonder why I pump so much time and effort into reviewing movies when it's doubtful many people even read my full reviews. With IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes and other websites full of critics more knowledgeable and better read than me, why should you bother with my writing? Well, I leave you to answer that question for yourself. Perhaps my primitive sense of humour will factor into your enjoyment of my reviews. Or perhaps it's that I am merely a lover of movies and do not consider myself a critic. Critics trash fun movies but praise wildly overrated, boring movies. I just like having fun at the movies... And I assess a movie as a guy who loves movies and seeks a good time.

I do not receive any money or revenue for my writing, so I write this as a passion and as a hobby. I aim to simply provide a fair, balanced analysis and commentary of a movie I've seen.

Thus, people may think I at times go too easy on a movie. Well, that's because I look for the good in all movies, even bad ones. I want to recognise the effort that has gone into a movie, and be fair to the filmmaker's intentions. I want to break into the film industry and I wish to make movies, so all films deserve a fair trial in my mind. I'd hate it for people to give a film of mine a low rating for a few purely nitpicking reasons.

I now mostly use Letterboxd (letterboxd.com/CalRambo1991) where I post a variety of mini-reviews that don't get carried across to here. Listal will still house my long-form reviews but not my shorter ones.

My reviews cannot be copied or reposted in whole or part without my express permission!
I once came across someone hovering around the web who copied my reviews word for smegging word.

However, you can link my reviews on your lists and stuff. That's perfectly cool. As long as I get credit

That's all I have to say.

Oh, and I post my reviews on a few different websites, most notably MichaelDVD and Manly Movie. I did some writing for Digital Hippos briefly... But that site is run by a bunch of cunts, so I didn't remain as a staff member. I suggest you guys avoid that site, too.

You'll find my reviews scattered on other websites around the web, including The Critical Critics, Flixster, Letterboxd and Manly Movie.

And finally...
Twitter feed: twitter.com/StrayButler91
YouTube Channel: www.youtube.com/user/PvtCaboose91
Link to Manly Movie: www.manlymovie.net/

Facebook? Dream on, internet stalkers...

Occupation: Filmmaker


Lists

15 votes
Movies Viewed in 2025 (227 items)
Movie list by PvtCaboose91
Published 9 months, 2 weeks ago 2 comments
9 votes
Classic Movies I've Seen In The Cinema (37 items)
Movie list by PvtCaboose91
Published 12 years, 6 months ago 2 comments
27 votes
Worst Films of All Time (116 items)
Movie list by PvtCaboose91
Published 16 years, 10 months ago 20 comments
9 votes
Films I've Seen At The Cinema The Most... (11 items)
Movie list by PvtCaboose91
Published 12 years, 3 months ago 1 comment
1 votes
TV Shows Viewed in 2023 (9 items)
Tv list by PvtCaboose91
Published 1 year, 12 months ago



Recent reviews

All reviews - Movies (1649) - TV Shows (38) - DVDs (2)

Genuinely fun and thrilling

Posted : 4 days, 17 hours ago on 13 October 2025 12:58 (A review of Fight or Flight)

Movies like Fight or Flight are a potent reminder of how good an unapologetic action flick can be in the right filmmaking hands. There is nothing revolutionary about the set-up or narrative, but the magic lies in the slick execution, with bone-crunching, R-rated action scenes, vibrant visuals, splashes of dark humour, lively characters, and an unpretentious screenplay. Plus, with a lean running time of 102 minutes, the movie does not outstay its welcome.


When agents working for the United States government learn that an elusive hacker known as the Ghost is in Bangkok, department head Katherine Brunt (Katee Sackhoff) wants the terrorist apprehended. However, with no capable field agents nearby, Brunt turns to a disgraced former Secret Service agent, Lucas Reyes (Josh Hartnett), her former boyfriend who was stranded in the country two years ago after botching an assignment. Brunt offers Lucas the chance to win back his freedom and life if he delivers the Ghost to her in San Francisco, alive and unharmed, requiring him to board a flight and identify the enigmatic figure. Soon after take-off, Lucas learns that there is a bounty on the Ghost's head, and the plane is full of ruthless mercenaries who are determined to claim the reward. As Lucas works to identify the target, he deals with flight attendants Isha (Charithra Chandran) and Royce (Danny Ashok), while Brunt continually asks for updates.

The compact runtime of Fight or Flight is a significant asset, as the screenplay avoids getting mired in unnecessary secondary subplots or convoluted complications. Screenwriters Brooks McLaren (2018's How It Ends) and D.J. Cotrona (an actor known for Shazam! and From Dusk Till Dawn: The Series, making his writing debut here) fill the picture with big personalities and engaging conflicts, consistently leaning into the tongue-in-cheek tone. Since the movie gets extremely violent at times, the light-hearted tone ensures the set pieces do not feel mean-spirited or uncomfortable.


Veteran visual effects artist and second unit director James Madigan makes his feature-film debut here after a couple of television credits, and he keeps the picture moving along at a confident pace. Considering the director's experience with second-unit action, it's no surprise that the action sequences throughout Fight or Flight are top-notch, featuring smooth camerawork and terrific choreography despite the confined setting, and often incorporating eccentric song choices. The plane being a gladiatorial arena full of killers gives the director a chance to incorporate some variety with the assailants, including Chilean martial artist Marko Zaror (John Wick: Chapter 4) and a skilled shaolin monk assassin played by JuJu Chan Szeto (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Sword of Destiny).

Considering Madigan's extensive VFX background, it is unsurprising that the director can effectively integrate sufficiently convincing digital effects, belying the modest budget (reports peg the cost at under $20 million). Admittedly, Fight or Flight is not as impossibly slick as the likes of the John Wick or Nobody films, but it carries more visual gravitas than any number of nasty, direct-to-video endeavours. Madigan even includes some trippy imagery when Lucas is high on toad venom towards the end of the film, adding an additional humorous touch. There's a hint of Bullet Train in the flick's stylistic execution, particularly since both movies take place on moving vehicles full of expert assassins, but the endeavour doesn't feel overly derivative. Madigan largely relies on practical bloodshed, but there are a few instances of phoney digital gore that detract from the visceral excitement.


Hartnett has great fun here, embracing the opportunity to play this goofy role as sincerely and believably as possible. There's a delirious, Looney Tunes-esque energy to Hartnett's performance at times, especially during the action scenes, and Lucas's blasé attitude towards killing is enormously funny. Plus, it's encouraging to see a male action hero in a 2025 movie who isn't subject to deconstruction or humiliation. Hartnett also reportedly performed all his own stunts and fight choreography, despite being nearly 50. Meanwhile, Katee Sackhoff makes a pretty good impression as a stock-standard shadowy government operative, trading sharp banter with Hartnett over the phone. However, there is not much for Sackhoff to do here except talk sternly (she was jealous of the amount of action Hartnett performed for the picture).

Perhaps my rating towards Fight or Flight is too generous since the movie is nothing profound, groundbreaking, or thematically rich. But with so much forgettable and underwhelming slop polluting multiplexes and streaming services, a genuinely fun action flick like this deserves its due credit. Minor flaws and all, Fight or Flight is a home run that genre fans will almost certainly enjoy.

7.8/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A WWII shark movie with thrills and suspense

Posted : 1 week, 1 day ago on 10 October 2025 01:17 (A review of Beast of War)

Most moviegoers will immediately think of the true-life story of the USS Indianapolis upon approaching 2025's Beast of War, as it's set during World War II and features shipwreck survivors confronting a monstrous, man-eating shark. Quint's infamous speech about the event in Steven Spielberg's Jaws influenced writer-director Kiah Roache-Turner to spearhead the project, though the filmmaker also took inspiration from another historical event: the sinking of the HMAS Armidale in the Timor Sea in 1942, during which sharks presumably devoured hundreds of Australian soldiers. Instead of the campy, B-movie vibe of the Nicolas Cage-starring USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage, Beast of War is a dark monster-horror movie offering visceral thrills, nail-biting suspense, and violent attacks.


In 1942, hundreds of Australian soldiers board a ship bound for Europe to join the Allied war effort after completing their basic training. Among them is an Aboriginal man, Leo (Mark Coles Smith), who makes friends with young Will (Joel Nankervis) during boot camp. But the warship sinks in the Timor Sea, resulting in countless casualties and leaving a small group of survivors on a makeshift raft, including Leo, Will, Des (Sam Delich), and Thompson (Sam Parsonson). With Japanese planes still in the area, the men cling to the hope of rescue as they drift with the tide and collect supplies from the floating debris field, but a more immediate threat emerges in the form of an enormous great white shark.

The Australian-born Roache-Turner is no stranger to monster movies after tackling zombies in his Wyrmwood flicks, and a giant spider in last year's Sting. The filmmaker sought to make a war movie with Beast of War, but since the horror genre is more marketable, adding a man-eating great white shark to the mix made it easier to raise the required financing. The oversaturated shark genre is full of hit-and-miss flicks about tourists who become stranded in the middle of the ocean (Great White, The Requin, Open Water 3, Shark Bait, Something in the Water... heck, a new one probably dropped on Netflix while writing this review), making Beast of War a welcome and enjoyable change of pace with its evocative WWII setting and distinctive visual style. The script also adds a unique angle by centring on an Aboriginal lead and respectfully representing Indigenous culture. Roache-Turner even has fun with the age-old trope of somebody eating all the food.


Before the carnage begins, Beast of War opens in the dense jungles of Australia (the Byron Bay hinterland, to be more specific), observing the military recruits as they train and bond. This opening segment offers welcome, efficient character work and varied scenery, resulting in more colourful, dynamic cinematography before the characters become stranded on a small raft in the middle of the ocean. After all, it is essential to care about the characters in a horror movie, but Roache-Turner's screenplay and casting are imperfect. Indeed, several of the characters are interchangeable, names do not always stick, and there's an element of villainy among the Aussie men that feels contrived and unnecessary.

To mask the small budget and disguise the lack of scope while shooting inside a studio tank in Brisbane, the movie relies on thick fog and shallow depth-of-field cinematography. The illusion is hugely effective, and the striking cinematography by Mark Wareham (Boy Swallows Universe, Clickbait) gives the picture honest-to-goodness visual gravitas, ensuring it does not look like another nasty low-budget distraction.


Miraculously, Beast of War also features an animatronic great white shark (affectionately known to the crew as Shazza), created by a Brisbane-based special effects company. The tangibility of the practical fish convincingly surpasses the dodgy CGI of countless other shark movies - because our brains can accept that this thing is real, the attack scenes are more terrifying and immediate. Additionally, instead of a realistic-looking shark, Shazza looks more grotesque and unnerving, with countless scars. Even the occasional digital effects shots (primarily when the shark appears underwater) look convincing, which is rare for an Aussie film. The attack scenes benefit from an R-rated punch that allows for plenty of bloodshed, and one soldier is even blown apart by a grenade. Wisely, Roache-Turner does not dwell on the gore, as he keeps the attacks taut and brutal while still delivering plenty of effective money shots.

Roache-Turner manages to have fun with the premise without Beast of War devolving into a mindless B-movie, incorporating moments like a climactic showdown with a Japanese soldier, and Leo facing down the monstrous shark. There are also splashes of humour to liven up the proceedings, including a desperate moment when the soldiers discuss drinking their own urine. Beast of War does start to wear out its welcome during the third act, as there is only so much material that Roache-Turner can mine from the premise of soldiers on a raft. However, with an economical running time of 87 minutes, the movie does not feel too prolonged or dull. If shark movies and/or horror flicks are your thing, Beast of War is worth your time and attention.

7.0/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Too long, too plodding, too forgettable

Posted : 1 week, 1 day ago on 9 October 2025 01:04 (A review of Play Dirty)

The last time Shane Black directed a feature film, the result was the cataclysmic disaster of The Predator, a project that woefully squandered its incredible potential and nearly killed the franchise for good. On the surface, 2025's Play Dirty is the perfect comeback vehicle for the filmmaker after a seven-year hiatus, as it's a story with eccentric characters, action scenes, profane dialogue, dead bodies, and a few twists and turns. However, the movie is a far cry from what we used to expect from the talented screenwriter who penned such classics as The Last Boy Scout and Lethal Weapon. Although it comes to life at times, Play Dirty struggles with a punishingly long running time and limp storytelling, making it another baffling misfire for the director.


A professional thief, Parker (Mark Wahlberg) orchestrates a heist to rob a racetrack count room with several trusted offsiders, including Philly (Thomas Jane) and Zen (Rosa Salazar). After the thieves escape with the loot, Zen betrays them, gunning down the team and leaving Parker for dead. Parker recuperates and looks to take revenge, but learns that Zen used the stolen funds from the horse track to finance another heist to steal treasure recovered from the Lady of Arintero shipwreck. The corrupt Ignacio De La Paz (Alejandro Edda), the president of a South American country, plans to retrieve the treasure and display it at the United Nations. The crucial part of De La Paz's plan involves hiring a crime syndicate known as the Outfit, led by Lozini (Tony Shalhoub), to steal the treasure from the UN, allowing the politician to sell it for billions and walk away with a substantial cut, leaving his country bankrupt. However, Zen wants to steal the treasure on behalf of the country's citizens. Parker quickly takes the lead on the heist, building a new team with a fellow thief and theatre company owner, Grofield (LaKeith Stanfield).

Filmmakers routinely adapt Donald E. Westlake's "Parker" book series for the screen, leading to movies like 1967's Point Blank, 1999's Payback with Mel Gibson in the lead role, and 2013's Parker with Jason Statham playing the titular part. Instead of adapting an existing novel, Play Dirty is an original story from screenwriters Shane Black, Charles Mondry, and Anthony Bagarozzi. With Parker recovering from his wounds and wanting to track down Zen, there's a simple set-up here for a revenge actioner in the mould of Payback, but the screenplay adds too many characters and complications. The execution is reminiscent of the helmer's timeless directorial debut, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, but that movie clocked in at under 100 minutes.


Unsurprisingly, Black fills the picture with his recognisable trademarks, including a noir feel and a Christmastime setting, while Alan Silvestri's catchy, jazz-infused score and the stylish animated opening credits sequence evoke Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Unfortunately, Play Dirty ends up feeling like a below-par imitation of a Shane Black movie. It lacks the snap, crackle, and pop of the director's best works, with the dialogue here sounding very ordinary and unremarkable, rather than razor-sharp and witty. Funny moments are present, but they are startlingly rare. Pacing is also off, and by the third act, the viewing experience feels exhausting and unnecessarily prolonged.

Shot with digital cameras and featuring a noticeable reliance on CGI, Play Dirty exhibits the clinical, unremarkable digital look characteristic of contemporary streaming movies. Put simply, there is no visual gravitas here that demands a big-screen viewing experience, making it unsurprising that the movie launched on Amazon Prime Video without any theatrical release. The small-scale shootouts and action beats are far more enjoyable than the over-the-top moments, which feature cartoonish digital effects that immediately stand out as fake and unconvincing. An opening chase is especially egregious, as it features digitally-created horses and wonky greenscreen work, kicking off the feature on an underwhelming note. The climactic heist is also not especially thrilling, as the characters never truly feel in danger. However, the R-rated punch to the violence is appreciated.


Wahlberg brings his trademark attitude to the role of Parker, never stepping outside of his comfort zone as he fires weapons and cracks wise. Black originally wanted Robert Downey Jr. for the lead role, which would have undoubtedly brought more spark and magic to the uninspiring ensemble here. LaKeith Stanfield and the always-reliable Keegan-Michael Key add some personality to the feature as thieves, but Black wastes talented names like the underrated Thomas Jane, and none of the performers can elevate the material above the ordinary. Too long, too plodding, and too forgettable, Play Dirty is a missed opportunity that only shows occasional glimmers of promise. It's watchable, but that's about it.

5.2/10


2 comments, Reply to this entry

One of 2025's defining cultural moments

Posted : 2 weeks, 5 days ago on 29 September 2025 03:21 (A review of KPop Demon Hunters)

A legitimate internet phenomenon that seemingly emerged out of nowhere, 2025's KPop Demon Hunters mixes gorgeously stylised anime-inspired visuals with an annoyingly catchy and infectious K-pop soundtrack. Despite appearing niche on the surface, it is an enormously enjoyable watch for viewers of all ages and tastes, benefitting from a thoughtful narrative and well-developed characters to supplement the outstanding spectacle. Co-director Maggie Kang (making her directorial debut) originally developed the unique idea for KPop Demon Hunters, seeking to devise a story steeped in Korean culture that blends K-pop tunes with Korean folklore and demonology. The resulting picture is a refreshing breath of fresh air, and it is utterly unique in a cinematic ocean dominated by reboots, sequels and remakes.


To prevent demons from continuing to feed on human souls, three singers-cum-demon-hunters used their singing to forge a magical barrier known as the Honmoon. Over hundreds of years, each new generation brings a new trio of singing demon hunters to help build the Golden Honmoon, a permanent seal to stop demons from entering the human world. In present-day Korea, the K-pop girl group Huntr/x fights demons and releases songs under the guidance of a former hunter, Celine (Yunjin Kim). Rumi (Arden Cho), Mira (May Hong), and Zoey (Ji-young Yoo) comprise Huntr/x, captivating an audience of millions with their popular songs. Meanwhile, the demon leader, Gwi-Ma (Lee Byung-hun), sends a group of demons to form the K-pop boy band Saja Boys, with the intention of stealing Huntr/x's fans and weakening the Honmoon. Leading the Saja Boys is Jinu (Ahn Hyo-seop), who soon makes a connection with Rumi after discovering that the demon hunter has a dark secret: she is part demon.

Among the key strengths of KPop Demon Hunters is the characters, as the trio of women are immediately likeable. Rumi, Mira, and Zoey are not generic, stoic heroes or one-dimensional "strong female characters"; instead, they are silly, fun, and disarming, and they look believable during the demon-slaying action set pieces. Rumi wrestling with her demon heritage provides unexpected depth, and her desperation to hide her true self from her peers out of fear and insecurity is relatable. Likewise, the connection between Rumi and Jinu adds an appreciable dimension to the story. The subplot ran the risk of feeling contrived for the sake of a romantic angle, but it instead feels earned and genuine, emerging as an organic part of the narrative. However, the film struggles to juggle the enormous ensemble, with characters like former demon hunter Celine and Huntr/x's manager, Bobby (Ken Jeong), feeling underused.


The vocal performances are sensational from top to bottom, with directors Maggie Kang and Chris Appelhans opting for unknown actors over star power. The movie does feature a few well-known Korean actors, including Daniel Dae Kim (Lost, Raya and the Last Dragon) as an eccentric doctor, Ken Jeong (The Hangover, Community) as Huntr/x's manager, and Lee Byung-hun (A Bittersweet Life, I Saw the Devil) as Gwi-Ma, the king of the demons. However, this does not feel like stunt casting, as the performers are excellent in their respective roles. With the production carrying a $100 million price tag, KPop Demon Hunters is visually lush and striking.

The wizards at Sony Pictures Imageworks (the same company responsible for the aesthetically intricate Spider-Verse pictures) do not aim for photorealism; instead, the feature carries a distinct style with deliberately imperfect movement that takes visible inspiration from anime. A wonderful sense of visual wit also permeates the movie, such as Zoey's eyes turning into sweetcorn emojis upon seeing the Saja Boys for the first time, which then produce popcorn as the scene heats up. Additionally, the approach to the action sequences is refreshing and intriguing, again reflecting the movie's anime influences. KPop Demon Hunters is short and sweet at 85 minutes before credits (make sure to stick around for some additional content during said credits), which ensures the movie never devolves into tedium. Admittedly, the storytelling is not always engaging, especially since some aspects of the lore could do with further clarification; however, this is a minor quibble.


The producers enlisted K-pop industry veterans to devise the soundtrack, and it's understandable why many of the songs have gone viral online. The movie's premise hinges on viewers believing that the K-pop tunes can unite people and, in turn, forge the Honmoon, making it all the more fortunate that the songs are so catchy. The songs of Huntr/x and the Saja Boys are noticeably distinct in style and tone, with the female K-pop stars singing soulful and emotionally honest songs while the demonic males sing impossibly catchy but hollow tunes. Netflix understandably cashed in on the soundtrack's extreme popularity, later releasing a sing-along version in cinemas and on their streaming service, which is sure to please the movie's avid fans.

KPop Demon Hunters is lightning in a bottle with its hyperkinetic filmmaking style, intriguing narrative, and those unbelievably captivating songs that will continue to receive hundreds of millions of hits. It is one of 2025's defining cultural moments in cinema, and it will undoubtedly be remembered with more reverence than Pixar's box-office bomb, Elio.

7.8/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Hilariously, entertainingly terrible

Posted : 2 months, 1 week ago on 7 August 2025 01:12 (A review of The Wicker Man)

Nobody will ever be able to earnestly defend 2006's The Wicker Man as a serious piece of cinema, with its risible dialogue, awful digital effects, questionable acting, and slipshod pacing. Written and directed by auteur filmmaker Neil LaBute, this ill-advised remake of the beloved 1973 British horror picture is ineffective as a thriller and a drama, as it's not scary, thrilling or compelling. However, as an unintentional comedy in the same vein as Tommy Wiseau's The Room, this modern iteration of The Wicker Man is a masterpiss of the highest order that offers plenty of sheer absurdity and endless overacting from the inimitable Nicolas Cage.


Traumatised after witnessing a tragic roadside accident that results in the death of an innocent mother and her daughter, policeman Edward Malus (Nicolas Cage) is stood down by his bosses as he mentally recuperates. However, Edward soon receives word from his ex-fiancée, Willow Woodward (Kate Beahan), that their daughter, Rowan (Erika Shaye Gair), is missing. Willow and Rowan live in an isolated, neo-pagan community on an island in remote Washington, and Edward sets off to visit. Determined to find Rowan, Edward starts poking around and asking questions about the matriarchal community led by the elderly Sister Summersisle (Ellen Burstyn). Edward's investigation only leads to frustration as the villagers are unable to give him straight answers, but the police officer suspects that something more sinister is going on.

The first half of The Wicker Man is regrettably dull and plodding, with LaBute trying to set up a sense of intrigue and mystery as Edward travels to the island and begins searching for Rowan. But at a certain point, the tedium gives way to unintentional hilarity, and the movie undeniably picks up steam as it becomes funnier than most mainstream comedies. We get bear costumes, bees, bee costumes, burned dolls, and karate kicks, among many other unexplainable things. At the centre of the madness is Nic Cage, who demonstrates absolutely no subtlety or restraint as he navigates the movie's strange occurrences, including stealing a bicycle at gunpoint. ("Step away from the bike!" he orders while brandishing a pistol.)


It's difficult to figure out exactly where things went wrong for The Wicker Man, as the individual components are not awful per se. After all, Nicolas Cage and Ellen Burstyn are both Oscar winners, and writer-director Neil LaBute previously directed well-received titles like In the Company of Men and The Shape of Things, both of which are based on his plays. However, the combination of everything here - the writing, direction, and acting - results in this bizarre, surreal, incoherent picture that often defies logical explanation. Whereas the original Wicker Man is full of atmosphere and dread, concluding with a disturbing and harrowing climax, LaBute's redux is hurt by the PG-13 rating that robs the film of genuine horror. The lust and sexual subtext of the original picture are likewise missing here, which is all the more heartbreaking when one considers how many more unintentional laughs could stem from such content.

Attempts at nuanced horror fall drastically short, with hilarious moments like Edward recalling a memory of a fellow police officer who then turns into a swarm of bees. Plus, the combination of extremely dramatic music and the sight of Nic Cage riding a bicycle is oddly amusing. Another scene that involves bees pursuing Edward is side-splitting, but the pièce de résistance is the moment in the unrated version wherein the villagers torture Edward by covering his face with bees. There are many ways an actor can play such a moment, and Cage chose maniacal overacting, with his panicked cry of "Not the bees!" resulting in an instant internet meme. The computer-generated bees look both hilarious and unconvincing, which further contributes to the comedy. Similarly, the fight scenes are side-splitting, with Cage karate kicking and punching several women, including Leelee Sobieski. Meanwhile, the sight of Cage in a bear costume had this reviewer in fits of laughter, and the infamous "bear punch" is hilarious beyond description.


Many scenes throughout The Wicker Man do not make sense. In one early scene, a pilot staunchly refuses to take Edward to the reclusive island because it's a private community, but he quickly changes his mind with the offer of money. Why didn't Edward specify that he had an invitation? Why would the pilot so passionately want to prevent an outsider from travelling to the island, but change his mind in seconds when Edward pulls out some cash? Another baffling but incredibly hilarious moment involves Edward flashing his "Freeway Patrol" badge while conducting enquiries, as if it's a detective badge. Does he hope the villagers won't notice? Or does Freeway Patrol give him such authority, even while not on active duty and nowhere near his jurisdiction? Who cares?

Without Nic Cage, this version of The Wicker Man would simply be an atrocious, boring attempt at a horror movie that tarnishes the name of a classic. But with Cage in the lead role, the movie is a hilarious car crash. It's still a disgrace to the original film, but at least it's entertainingly terrible, which is more than what I can say for many other bad horror films. It's also rare for me to not want a movie to end, but I genuinely did not want The Wicker Man to finish, because every scene brought immense new hilarity. It is genuinely baffling to consider that the picture went through all stages of production - scripting, shooting, editing, rough cuts - without anybody apparently recognising the serious flaws or indescribable goofiness. If you have an appetite for this kind of thing, The Wicker Man is an essential watch.

Will I watch this again? Yes, I watched it twice. Will I buy it on Blu-ray? Also yes.

4.6/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A fun and funny British animated feature

Posted : 2 months, 1 week ago on 5 August 2025 07:19 (A review of Flushed Away)

The third and final Aardman collaboration with DreamWorks, 2006's Flushed Away is a bright, colourful and enormously enjoyable animated movie from the acclaimed British animation studio. With a screenplay credited to five writers, the picture is a gender-swapped version of The African Queen that takes place in a sewer, involves rats, and also includes elements of gangster and pirate movies. Although Flushed Away carries the feeling of a shallow DreamWorks Animation production from the era (Shark Tale, Over the Hedge), and it lacks the dramatic heft and emotional resonance of a Pixar offering, the sharp British wit and boundless creativity undeniably elevate the endeavour. It's no Ratatouille, but it's fun and funny.


Roddy St. James (Hugh Jackman) is a spoiled pet rat who lives in an upscale area of Central London. But when his owners are away on holiday, Roddy's idyllic life of luxury comes to an end with the arrival of a lazy, overweight sewer rat named Sid (Shane Richie). While attempting to get rid of Sid, the sewer rat flushes Roddy down the toilet, leading him to the underground city of Ratropolis. Desperate to find his way home, Roddy seeks out Rita Malone (Kate Winslet), a boat captain who may be able to use her vessel to return him to his luxurious apartment. But the situation becomes more complicated when Rita and Roddy get mixed up with a local gangster, the Toad (Ian McKellen), who has a devious plan to eradicate Ratropolis.

Flushed Away sees Aardman dabbling in computer animation for the first time instead of their traditional claymation approach. (At the time, the studio was fresh from Chicken Run and Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit.) Using CGI here was not a permanent move away from claymation but merely a necessary alternative because the picture contains several scenes involving water, which is a logistical nightmare for claymation, and it is expensive to add digital water to practical animation in post-production. The impossibly smooth digital sheen of Flushed Away makes it obvious that this is not a stop-motion film, though the deliberately jittery movements (particularly the mouth movements) emulate claymation. Similarly, the character designs are uniquely Aardman, including British overbites and large, round eyes, which resemble the studio's traditional plasticine maquettes. The animation is undeniably lush, but a bit more cinematic texture could have augmented the movie's sense of visual personality.


A cheeky, extremely British sense of humour permeates Flushed Away, as the movie contains plenty of uproarious sight gags, slapstick, and satire, with the almost omnipresent slugs being particularly memorable. The script even mines humour from Hugh Jackman's participation that avid fans will appreciate, including Roddy thinking about wearing a traditional yellow Wolverine costume in the opening credits (how quaint this looks in 2025), and Roddy dressing in a tuxedo like James Bond after the actor legendarily turned down the role of 007 for 2006's Casino Royale. Flushed Away also references other movies (there are even sound effects from Star Wars), and Roddy's DVD collection features several recognisable films with slight title changes: Ratman, Ratman Returns, and My Big Fat Greek Bottom feature on the shelf, among others. It's clear that the creators are big movie fans.

Flushed Away was the feature-film debut for co-directors Sam Fell and David Bowers, two English animators who worked on other projects for Aardman before tackling this picture. The directors keep the movie zipping along at an agreeable pace and incorporate a satisfying array of recognisable and catchy songs, from "Dancing with Myself" for the opening credits to Jet's "Are You Gonna Be My Girl?" and Tina Turner's "Proud Mary." However, the movie is a touch too lightweight. The story hits several predictable beats in the third act, but none of the character arcs amount to anything meaningful or poignant, nor are there any heartwarming messages to convey. Flushed Away is all surface, and although this is not necessarily a bad thing, it's a shame the script does not make more of an effort to incorporate emotion amid the laughs. Additionally, the pace slows down when the directors deal with the Toad's evil plan, which takes the focus away from the movie's charming centre: Roddy and Rita. Flushed Away is still sufficiently fun, but it does start to run out of steam in the third act despite only running a scant 75 minutes.


The ensemble cast bursts with international talent, and each of the performers contributes an immense sense of personality to their respective roles. Jackman ably stifles his natural Australian accent to play the suave, upper-class Roddy, giving the character a distinct voice that sounds nothing like the beloved performer. Kate Winslet provides terrific support, turning Rita into a spunky and feisty rat. Additionally, the always reliable and iconic Ian McKellen is a superb pick for the Toad, while Bill Nighy and Andy Serkis (McKellen's The Lord of the Rings co-star) play the Toad's top two hench-rats. Jean Reno also contributes further colour as Le Frog, the Toad's French cousin, who's a master of martial arts.

Flushed Away does not reach the heights of Aardman's best efforts, and it's not particularly memorable, but it's an enormously entertaining movie with colourful characters (the slugs!), some inventive action scenes, and plenty of side-splitting British wit. Children will appreciate the feature's cheeky sense of humour and the adorable character designs, and the movie is not a monotonous chore for adults to sit through.

7.4/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A charming, wonderful family movie

Posted : 2 months, 2 weeks ago on 29 July 2025 01:27 (A review of The Parent Trap)

1998's The Parent Trap won me over almost immediately, and by the half-hour mark, I was so invested in the story and characters that I did not want the film to end. It's a broad, formulaic cornucopia of Hollywood romantic comedy clichés, and it is also a remake of the 1961 film of the same name, but the picture nevertheless works on every level: it's a charming, wonderful delight, the equivalent of a warm cinematic hug. The Parent Trap might be a Disney family movie, but it's one of those rare family movies that will appeal to children and adults alike.


At an all-girl summer camp, eleven-year-old Hallie Parker (Lindsay Lohan) meets Annie James (also Lohan), who looks exactly like her and is the same age. Although a rivalry initially breaks out as the pair play pranks on each other, they develop a bond and soon realise they are identical twin sisters who were separated when they were babies. Hallie lives in Napa Valley with her father, Nick (Dennis Quaid), while Annie lives in London with her mother, Elizabeth (Natasha Richardson). Since Hallie has never met her mother and Annie has not met her father, and they share a mutual interest in getting their parents back together, they hatch a plan to switch places and push for Nick and Elizabeth to reconcile. Annie pretends to be Hallie as Nick takes her to Napa Valley, where she discovers that the gold-digging Meredith Blake (Elaine Hendrix) is engaged to marry her father in a matter of weeks. Meanwhile, Hallie pretends to be Annie as she spends time in London with her mother while endeavouring to reunite Elizabeth with Nick. Meredith's presence complicates the plan, leading to radical action between the sisters.

At the helm of The Parent Trap is Nancy Meyers, a veteran comedy screenwriter (Father of the Bride, Once Upon a Crime...) who would later direct films like Something's Gotta Give and The Holiday. Meyers was making her directorial debut here, but the picture is astonishingly slick and competent, boasting the talents of several talented creatives, from cinematographer Dean Cundey (Jurassic Park, Apollo 13) to composer Alan Silvestri (Back to the Future, Predator). Meyers even packs the movie with joyous songs that perfectly accompany Silvestri's music, from the timeless "Bad to the Bone" to Bob Khaleel's rendition of "Here Comes the Sun." Additionally, through the use of body doubles and seamless split-screens using motion-controlled cameras, Lohan believably plays both Hallie and Annie, and the illusion never falters. You easily forget the gimmick and accept that there are two Lindsay Lohans.


As with most of Meyers's films, The Parent Trap is a touch too long at a beefy two hours, and the narrative is not exactly surprising, but it's easy to go along for the ride. Meyers wrote the screenplay with her husband, Charles Shyer (director and co-writer of 1991's Father of the Bride), to update the story for the 1990s. However, the writer-director of 1961's The Parent Trap, David Swift, also receives a credit because the narrative so closely resembles the original film. Although remakes are often useless, especially if there's no narrative reinvention, 1998's The Parent Trap more than justifies its existence with the charming cast and witty, disarming sense of humour. Meyers finds a distinct cinematic voice for this iteration, and it's significantly better and more agreeable than most contemporary family movies.

Despite all the contrivances at the centre of the story, Meyers elevates The Parent Trap with her superb execution of the material, making it easy to care about the story and characters. The moment that Hallie and Annie realise they are twins is incredibly touching, and it is equally heartwarming to watch Nick and Elizabeth as they reunite with the daughter they have not seen for over a decade. These moments do not feel manipulative or false, as the acting thoroughly sells it, while Silvestri's poignant score adds another layer of emotion. Likewise, Nick's effort to win Elizabeth back in the finale undeniably works because you want to see them end up together, regardless of how predictable the outcome is.


The Parent Trap was Lohan's film debut after a few television appearances, and the actress is remarkable here in the tricky dual role. She espouses a wholly convincing British accent to play Annie, while she also believably plays an American pretending to be English, and a British girl pretending to be American - virtually four characters in one movie. It's easy to see why the talented Lohan went on to star in several more iconic cult movies, including Freaky Friday and Mean Girls. Thankfully, the other cast members are equally appealing, including Dennis Quaid (Innerspace, DragonHeart) as Nick, and the late Natasha Richardson (The Handmaid's Tale) as Elizabeth. Elaine Hendrix is also easy to despise as the stereotypical "evil stepmother" figure, while Simon Kunz is hilarious as Elizabeth and Annie's butler, Martin.

In 2018, rumours circulated of another The Parent Trap remake for Disney+, but it thankfully has not yet come to pass. (Judging by the quality of Home Sweet Home Alone, nothing good can come from a D+ remake.) There were also sequel talks, but with the tragic passing of Natasha Richardson in 2009, it seems impossible to make a satisfying follow-up at this point. 1998's The Parent Trap remains an enjoyable product of its time, a breezy and amicable rom-com that does not need any further remakes or sequels to tarnish it.

7.8/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Hilarious and highly satisfying romp

Posted : 2 months, 3 weeks ago on 25 July 2025 06:04 (A review of Deep Cover)

Far above the usual standard for straight-to-streaming comedies, 2025's Deep Cover is a hilariously madcap twist on British crime films that incorporates the subculture and art of improvisation. Bizarrely, Jurassic World masterminds Colin Trevorrow and Derek Connolly conceived of the unique premise of improv actors going undercover to infiltrate a criminal organisation, with British comedy duo Ben Ashenden and Alexander Owen penning the screenplay. The feature is full of comedic highlights, particularly with such an ideal cast capably handling the clever material, making this a rare streaming production worthy of repeat viewings.


Kat (Bryce Dallas Howard) is a struggling stand-up comedian from America who teaches an improvisational class in London while hoping her career will lead to bigger and better things. Among her students is Marlon (Orlando Bloom), a frustrated actor who yearns for bigger roles and struggles to escape his reputation as "The Pizza Knight" from a television commercial. Also joining the improv class is Hugh (Nick Mohammed), an introverted corporate employee who hopes to develop his confidence. After Detective Sergeant Billings (Sean Bean) recruits Kat to participate in low-level sting operations in London, she convinces Marlon and Hugh to form a trio with her. Unexpectedly, the three manage to win the trust of a mid-level dealer named Fly (Paddy Considine), who answers to ruthless importer Metcalfe (Ian McShane). The actors rapidly find themselves in over their heads, but they are at the mercy of Billings, who insists that they stay undercover.

Unlike most mainstream comedies, Deep Cover carries an R rating, which permits bloodletting and profanity. It is difficult to imagine a comedy set in this world that would work within the confines of a PG-13 rating, as the swearing makes the characters more believable and amplifies the humour a hundredfold. However, Deep Cover's story is slightly overstuffed, and some of the twists and turns are not exactly surprising. Clocking in at 95 minutes, the movie does not outstay its welcome, but it does try to juggle too many elements, including Albanian gangsters, police actively pursuing the acting trio, and the various levels of the drug-dealing organisation. Nevertheless, this is a minor drawback to an otherwise extremely entertaining comedy.


The script's innate and accurate understanding of actors is one of the cleverest parts of Deep Cover, with the frustrated Marlon continuing to veer off-script during improv scenes and auditions as he desperately begs his agent for proper dramatic work, and Kat enduring ridicule from her friends while pursuing things like solo shows as she tries to crack the big time. Meanwhile, Hugh is inexperienced and struggles with his confidence, unsure about how to act as he takes cues from his fellow performers. Actors will relate to the experiences and characteristics here, with the recognisable traits turning the central trio into likable, relatable people who are easy to care about. Incorporating such characters into an action comedy is simply ingenious.

Deep Cover soars when it puts Marlon, Kat, and Hugh together as they try to navigate tricky situations, including a spectacularly cringey attempt to buy counterfeit cigarettes while a bewildered Billings listens from a distance, and their attempt to intimidate and extract money from a former hitman. Going undercover also necessitates the use of aliases, with Kat, Marlon, and Hugh becoming "Bonnie," "Roach," and "The Squire," putting the improv principle of "yes, and?" to the test. Orlando Bloom, Bryce Dallas Howard, and Nick Mohammed are note-perfect here, playing off each other with ease. The unhinged Bloom is the standout, as Marlon continually takes things too far. It's also fun to see Bloom interact with Lord of the Rings co-star Sean Bean, who's a straight man amid the chaos. Other recognisable also appear, including the always reliable Paddy Considine, who brings personality and edge to the role of fly, and Ian McShane, who turns Metcalfe into a sufficiently sinister kingpin type.


At the helm of Deep Cover is Tom Kingsley, a British television veteran who directed episodes of sitcoms like Stath Lets Flats, Ghosts, and Pls Like. Thanks to his television background, Kingsley brings a high level of energy and a frenetic pace to the production, never dwelling too long on any joke or comedic set piece. Stylistically, the picture emulates the look of British crime movies and TV shows, featuring shadowy, stylish cinematography and an abundance of handheld camerawork. Despite the absurdity of moments like a police chase involving bicycles, Kingsley treats everything with sincerity. An unexpected sense of visual gravitas elevates Deep Cover, as it eschews the bright, clean digital visual style typical of most streaming content. Indeed, even though the picture is frequently uproarious, it carries the appearance of a serious crime thriller rather than a parody or a low-budget imitation.

The decision to send Deep Cover to streaming is baffling, as the picture carries the polished look of a theatrical feature and is far funnier than most comedies that made it to cinemas recently. (It's infinitely better than A Minecraft Movie.) It's an unexpected delight that seemingly emerged out of nowhere, and it will appeal to viewers who enjoy unpretentious action comedies like 21 Jump Street and Hot Fuzz. With its strong British flavour and plenty of laugh-out-loud moments, Deep Cover is a funny and highly satisfying romp.

7.4/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Disposable and generic but enjoyable

Posted : 2 months, 3 weeks ago on 25 July 2025 02:57 (A review of Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer)

For a sequel to a wholly unremarkable superhero film, 2007's Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer is not awful. Like its predecessor, it's a harmlessly diverting superhero tale that pales in comparison to the best Marvel films, but is neither disastrous nor offensive; instead, it merely suffers from a lack of narrative ambition. With the obligatory origin nonsense out of the way, Rise of the Silver Surfer is zippier and more fun, indulging in more colourful action sequences and reducing the downtime between the set pieces. In other words, it amounts to a flashy 90-minute special effects reel aimed at preteen boys who enjoy superhero antics and mindless spectacle. However, this follow-up feels even more disposable and shallow as a result. It never reaches the heights of the best superhero movies, but at least it fills a niche for viewers who dislike darker, more serious genre outings.


After a mysterious cosmic object enters the Earth's atmosphere and causes unusual occurrences, U.S. Army General Hager (Andre Braugher) approaches Reed Richards (Ioan Gruffudd) to ask for help tracking its movements. With days left before Reed marries Sue Storm (Jessica Alba), he begins constructing a tracking system for the government while the media goes into a frenzy over the impending wedding. However, the wedding is interrupted by the arrival of the Silver Surfer (Doug Jones), a metallic humanoid on a flying surfboard who wreaks mass destruction. With the world in jeopardy, the Fantastic Four - Reed/Mr. Fantastic, Sue/Invisible Woman, Ben Grimm/The Thing (Michael Chiklis), and Johnny Storm/Human Torch (Chris Evans) - work to try and stop the Silver Surfer, reluctantly accepting the assistance of Dr. Victor Von Doom (Julian McMahon). However, Doom has an ulterior motive, and the Silver Surfer answers to a more powerful entity that survives by feeding on life-bearing planets.

Rise of the Silver Surfer brings back several creatives who were involved in the first flick, from director Tim Story and co-writer Mark Frost to composer John Ottman and editor William Hoy. Also contributing to the screenplay this time is Don Payne, a long-time writer for The Simpsons who was fresh from penning the 2006 superhero rom-com My Super Ex-Girlfriend. This Fantastic Four sequel is more amusing than its predecessor, and the dialogue is less wooden, though the laughs are not exactly memorable or clever. However, despite its technical razzle-dazzle, the film sorely lacks substance. Since Rise of the Silver Surfer runs under 90 minutes, there is not enough time for sufficient dramatic development or meaty character arcs. There is an attempt at something deep with Reed and Sue wanting a normal married life without the superhero business, but it feels obligatory and rushed instead of substantive and thoughtful. Consequently, it is difficult to care about the characters, even when one of them nearly dies during the climax. Sam Raimi's Spider-Man films demonstrated how to effectively add poignancy and humanity to a superhero story, but the Fantastic Four pictures fall short.


With a higher budget, Rise of the Silver Surfer's visuals are more impressive and slick than the first flick, but some of the CGI - especially for Reed's rubbery body - looks dated and phoney. Story is more at ease with the material here, and he achieves a more agreeable pace, but the execution is still completely generic and lacking a stylish filmmaking touch. Nevertheless, the action scenes are sufficiently enjoyable, from a destructive set piece in London to a climactic throwdown in Shanghai, with Story expanding the story's scope beyond the United States. To ensure the film is appropriate for younger viewers, Story tones down the violence compared to the 2005 movie, as Rise of the Silver Surfer is PG instead of PG-13. Consequently, even though Galactus threatens to destroy the Earth, the movie is not nail-biting or intense, as it feels more like a two-part episode of a lightweight cartoon TV show than a theatrical action-adventure.

In the years since Rise of the Silver Surfer's release, online commentators continue to criticise the movie's use of Galactus, and for good reason. A quintessential Marvel villain, Galactus appears briefly in the film, and the depiction fails to properly serve the character. The lack of screen time and any character development is baffling, and the design does not even slightly reflect the comics - instead of a powerful humanoid entity, the movie depicts Galactus as a cloud. Similarly, the Silver Surfer does not receive the development or nuance he deserves, and Doom remains startlingly one-dimensional, though Julian McMahon continues to have a lot of fun in the role. Fox intended to pursue a Silver Surfer spinoff movie as early as 1998, and in 2007, the studio hired filmmaker and comic book writer J. Michael Straczynski to write the picture. The spinoff was intended to explore the Surfer's origins and further develop Galactus, delving into darker territory. Rise of the Silver Surfer even ends with a brief tease to set up the planned spinoff. Frankly, it is a shame the Silver Surfer movie never came to pass.


The visualisation of the Silver Surfer often looks impressively convincing despite the limitations of special effects in 2007. Doug Jones, best known for playing non-human creatures in Guillermo del Toro films, portrays the metallic character in a special grey-silver suit enhanced by digital effects. The instantly recognisable Laurence Fishburne provides the voice, which gives the Surfer a regal quality. Also joining the cast is the late Andre Braugher, whose character serves as a stand-in for Nick Fury. The filmmakers wanted to include Fury but did not have the rights, as Marvel was preparing to introduce Samuel L. Jackson's portrayal in 2008's Iron Man. Out of the titular team, Chris Evans remains the most energetic as the brash, womanising Johnny Storm, while Michael Chiklis again makes a great impression despite wearing an elaborate suit to play The Thing. Continuing the longstanding Marvel tradition, Stan Lee also pops in for another cameo.

Considering the popularity of Marvel's First Family, these big-screen iterations should be much better. With millions of dollars at their disposal, it is a shame this creative team were unable to create something on the same level as Spider-Man or X-Men. Unpretentious and unserious, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer is akin to a B-grade, straight-to-video action adventure from the '80s or '90s but with a bigger budget and state-of-the-art production values. It might work for some viewers, but your mileage will vary. Although Fox planned to pursue a third instalment (the cast signed a three-picture deal), the underwhelming box office haul put a stop to any immediate plans, and Marvel locking in Evans as Captain America put the final nail in the coffin of a prospective Fantastic Four 3, for better or worse. In hindsight, the notion of another inoffensive, forgettable Fantastic Four outing with this cast and from the same creative team seems more enticing than Josh Trank's irredeemable 2015 reboot, Fant4stic.

5.8/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry

Pedestrian and by-the-numbers but not awful

Posted : 2 months, 3 weeks ago on 24 July 2025 06:26 (A review of Fantastic Four)

2005's Fantastic Four emerged before the Marvel Cinematic Universe era, when studios licensed several iconic comic book characters in the hope of creating lucrative blockbuster franchises. After the success of Spider-Man and X-Men, Marvel's First Family was an obvious candidate for a big-budget adaptation. With a script credited to Mark Frost (Twin Peaks) and Michael France (2003's Hulk), Fantastic Four retains the light-hearted, adventurous tone of the comic books, but the feature is startlingly pedestrian and by-the-numbers, making it one of the lesser Marvel adaptations to date. With an enormous pool of potential directors, it is baffling that 20th Century Fox handed the filmmaking reins to Tim Story, who was fresh from helming 2004's critically reviled action comedy Taxi. Although not awful, Fantastic Four is incredibly mediocre, as it lacks wit, heart, a sense of humanity, and passion. It delivers the bare minimum for the genre, but there is nothing to elevate it above the ordinary.


While studying cosmic clouds in space, Dr. Reed Richards (Ioan Gruffudd), Sue Storm (Jessica Alba), Johnny Storm (Chris Evans), and Ben Grimm (Michael Chiklis) are struck by a cloud and soon develop superpowers after arriving back on Earth. Reed discovers that he can stretch his body like rubber, Sue can turn invisible and create force fields, Johnny can transform into a human fireball, and Ben transforms into a superhuman rock monster. The media dub them "The Fantastic Four," with superhero names also emerging: Reed is Mister Fantastic, Sue is Invisible Woman, Johnny is Human Torch, and Ben is The Thing. Meanwhile, Dr. Victor Von Doom (Julian McMahon) blames Reed for the failure of the mission, for which he faces backlash from his stockholders. As the Fantastic Four work together to study their abilities and hopefully find a cure, Doom begins to mutate into organic metal and plans to use his powers to exact revenge.

Fantastic Four is not the first live-action movie featuring the Marvel superhero team created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, as Roger Corman produced a cheap, famously unreleased feature film version in the early 1990s that was shelved after completion. In the ensuing years, Fox pursued a big-budget adaptation, though it took ten years for Fantastic Four to enter multiplexes after a decade of development hell. Unsurprisingly, Frost and France's script adheres to the familiar origin story template, depicting the titular team receiving their powers and learning to deal with the abrupt change. The film will likely disappoint viewers hoping for endless action and spectacle, as the set pieces are few and far between; however, this is not necessarily a bad thing. However, the villainous aspect of the story is distinctly lacking. Despite the presence of the terrific Julian McMahon, Doom's portrayal fails to do justice to the iconic comic book villain, as the script reduces the nuanced character to a simplistic, generic, one-dimensional bad guy. The script does not give Doom a compelling motive or even a proper plan - he merely wants to destroy the Fantastic Four because he is envious of the publicity they are receiving. Even a trite world domination plot would be more interesting than this.


Furthermore, with the movie trying to give the spotlight to everyone in the titular team, there is no singular protagonist in Fantastic Four, which makes it challenging to become genuinely invested in the story. The most promising subplot involves Ben's fiancée, Debbie (Laurie Holden), who cannot accept his physical condition. Ben's story comes teasingly close to being poignant, especially when Debbie silently leaves her ring on the road to silently call off their engagement, but this narrative thread ultimately feels too insignificant and perfunctory, never delivering any genuine emotion. Similarly, Ben's newfound relationship with a blind artist named Alicia (Kerry Washington) feels tragically undercooked. It feels like the film was pared down to the bare essentials during editing, which is indeed the case, as Fox later restored 20 minutes of unseen footage for an obligatory extended cut on home video, which contains more character-building moments.

Despite a generous $100 million budget, Fantastic Four is workmanlike from a technical perspective, with passable but not spectacular special effects, unremarkable cinematography, and a forgettable original score that fails to introduce a recognisable theme. After going through several directors (including Chris Columbus, Peter Segal, Raja Gosnell, and Peyton Reed) and a long development period, Fox hired Tim Story and rushed the movie to meet its summer 2005 release date, allowing barely six months for post-production. The problem is that Story is not a visionary director in the same league as Christopher Nolan or Sam Raimi, and he is in over his head with Fantastic Four. There is nothing unique, exciting or stylish about Story's handling of the picture, as he does the bare minimum in translating script to screen. The narrative is not constantly engaging, and the pacing is hit-and-miss, though there are a few highlights. One enjoyable sequence is a goofy montage of the titular team adjusting to their powers while Johnny plays a prank on Ben, set to the tune of Gabin's " Bang Bang to the Rock 'n Roll."


2005 was a different time for big-screen special effects, as CGI merely supplemented, rather than replaced, practical effects and sets. Fantastic Four was the last time that filmmakers used practical effects to bring The Thing to life, and the suit is enormously believable and impressive. The production also constructed a 200-foot set for the Brooklyn Bridge action sequence, rather than relying solely on digital effects. Unfortunately, the CGI throughout Fantastic Four is a mixed bag, with moments of slipshod compositing that looked below-par in 2005 and look even worse after two decades. Not everything looks awful, as the flame effects for the Human Torch are impressive, but the rubbery Mr. Fantastic appears overly cartoonish. Meanwhile, the action scenes are sufficiently entertaining, from the much-publicised bridge sequence to a climactic showdown with Doctor Doom, but none of the set pieces are necessarily riveting or exhilarating.

In terms of casting, Fantastic Four is a mixed bag. The late Julian McMahon sinks his teeth into Doom and brings a sinister edge to the role, though Doom's relationship with Sue is wholly uninteresting and unconvincing. Indeed, Jessica Alba is pleasant eye candy, and the film even contains a gratuitous underwear scene for the actress, but she fails to bring any dimensionality or passion to Sue Storm. Likewise, Welsh actor Ioan Gruffudd tries his best but does not make a significant impression as Reed Richards, although his American accent is convincing. Faring better is Chris Evans, the future Captain America, who makes the biggest impression as the smarmy Johnny Storm, consistently engaging in pranks and stirring up his friends in increasingly amusing ways. Evans generates the movie's only moments of genuine humour, and his charisma and gusto make him a perfect Johnny Storm, making it unsurprising that Evans later reprised his role in 2024's Deadpool & Wolverine. Rounding out the team is Michael Chiklis, who delivers a terrific performance underneath the elaborate suit, espousing a gravelly voice and making the character feel real. Meanwhile, the late Stan Lee is also on hand here, making a cameo appearance as a postal worker.


Twenty years after its release, Fantastic Four remains a curious footnote in superhero cinema, overshadowed by the unreleased 1994 film and its associated complications, as well as the disastrous 2015 reboot, which was plagued by reshoots, studio interference, a disgraced director, and its eventual critical mauling. With an inadequate director and a mediocre script, 2005's Fantastic Four never reaches its full potential, although it is superior to a number of recent Marvel Cinematic Universe productions, as the franchise has lost its lustre. This adaptation is harmlessly diverting and watchable, striking the middle ground between the brilliance of Sam Raimi's Spider-Man and the direness of Catwoman.

5.9/10


0 comments, Reply to this entry


« Prev12 3 4 5 6 7 » 17 » 169 Next »


Movies

Favorite - View all
My movies page

Rated 5753 movies

TV

Top rated
My tv page

Rated 300 tv

Games

Favorite - View all
My games page

Rated 52 games

Music

Favorite - View all
My music page

Rated 16 music

Books

Favorite - View all
My books page

Rated 35 books

DVDs

Top rated
My dvds page

Rated 122 dvds

My feed

PvtCaboose91 posted 4 images

4 days, 13 hours ago
PvtCaboose91 added 6 items to their collection
Scooby-Doo on Zombie Island

have watched

8/10

Amityville Dollhouse

have watched

5/10

Amityville: A New Generation

have watched

5/10

Amityville 1992: It

have watched

5/10

Campfire Tales

have watched

7/10


4 days, 13 hours ago
PvtCaboose91 commented on a list
My Favourite MANLY Movies! (40 movies items)

"I would love to see it updated. I'm an asshole, assuming you have time for that!"


4 days, 17 hours ago
PvtCaboose91 added 16 items to Movies Viewed in 2025 list
Beast of War
V/H/S/Halloween
Fight or Flight
Play Dirty
The Life of Chuck

4 days, 17 hours ago
PvtCaboose91 posted a review of Fight or Flight

Genuinely fun and thrilling

“Movies like Fight or Flight are a potent reminder of how good an unapologetic action flick can be in the right filmmaking hands. There is nothing revolutionary about the set-up or narrative, but the magic lies in the slick execution, with bone-crunching, R-rated action scenes, vibrant visuals, splas” read more

4 days, 17 hours ago
PvtCaboose91 posted 21 images [View All]

4 days, 17 hours ago
PvtCaboose91 added 8 items to their collection
Possession

have watched

7/10

The Amityville Curse

have watched

2/10

Warlock

have watched

6/10

The Little Vampire

have watched

5/10

V/H/S/Halloween

have watched

6/10


4 days, 17 hours ago
PvtCaboose91 posted a review of Beast of War

A WWII shark movie with thrills and suspense

“Most moviegoers will immediately think of the true-life story of the USS Indianapolis upon approaching 2025's Beast of War, as it's set during World War II and features shipwreck survivors confronting a monstrous, man-eating shark. Quint's infamous speech about the event in Steven Spielberg's Jaws i” read more

1 week, 1 day ago
Beast of War
 Beast of War 7/10
1 week, 1 day ago
I'm a big fan of The Nice Guys!!
1 week, 1 day ago
PvtCaboose91 posted a review of Play Dirty

Too long, too plodding, too forgettable

“The last time Shane Black directed a feature film, the result was the cataclysmic disaster of The Predator, a project that woefully squandered its incredible potential and nearly killed the franchise for good. On the surface, 2025's Play Dirty is the perfect comeback vehicle for the filmmaker after ” read more

1 week, 1 day ago
Play Dirty
 Play Dirty 5/10
1 week, 1 day ago
PvtCaboose91 posted 21 images [View All]

2 weeks, 5 days ago
PvtCaboose91 added 2 items to Movies Viewed in 2025 list
Bambi: The Reckoning
 One Battle After Another

2 weeks, 5 days ago
PvtCaboose91 added 2 items to their collection
Bambi: The Reckoning

have watched

5/10

 One Battle After Another

9/10


2 weeks, 5 days ago
PvtCaboose91 posted a review of KPop Demon Hunters

One of 2025's defining cultural moments

“A legitimate internet phenomenon that seemingly emerged out of nowhere, 2025's KPop Demon Hunters mixes gorgeously stylised anime-inspired visuals with an annoyingly catchy and infectious K-pop soundtrack. Despite appearing niche on the surface, it is an enormously enjoyable watch for viewers of all” read more

2 weeks, 5 days ago
PvtCaboose91 added 7 items to Movies Viewed in 2025 list
Storm of the Century
The Fury
The War of the Roses
Locked
KPop Demon Hunters

2 weeks, 6 days ago
PvtCaboose91 added 7 items to their collection
The Fury

have watched

6/10

The War of the Roses

have watched

7/10

Storm of the Century

have watched

7/10

Locked

have watched

6/10

KPop Demon Hunters

have watched

8/10


2 weeks, 6 days ago
PvtCaboose91 added 1 item to Movies Viewed in 2025 list
Amityville 4: The Evil Escapes

1 month ago
PvtCaboose91 posted 2 images

1 month ago
PvtCaboose91 added 2 items to Movies Viewed in 2025 list
White Noise 2: The Light
The Thursday Murder Club

1 month ago
PvtCaboose91 added 2 items to their collection
White Noise 2: The Light

have watched

6/10

The Thursday Murder Club

7/10


1 month ago
Jaws
Viewed three times during its 50th anniversary season in 2025: once in IMAX, and twice in 4DX.

1 month ago
PvtCaboose91 added 5 items to their collection
Kill Me Three Times

have watched

6/10

Deadly Friend

have watched

6/10

Singles

have watched

8/10

The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement

have watched

6/10


1 month, 1 week ago
PvtCaboose91 posted 23 images [View All]

1 month, 1 week ago
PvtCaboose91 posted 4 images

1 month, 1 week ago
PvtCaboose91 added 12 items to Movies Viewed in 2025 list
The Conjuring: Last Rites
Kill Me Three Times
Deadly Friend
Hallow Road
Singles

1 month, 1 week ago
PvtCaboose91 added 9 items to their collection
Sisters

have watched

7/10

House of the Long Shadows

have watched

6/10

The Conjuring: Last Rites

have watched

6/10

Hallow Road

have watched

7/10

Primitive War

have watched

6/10


1 month, 1 week ago
PvtCaboose91 added 1 item to Movies Viewed in 2025 list
Sisters
First Viewing Viewing Date: August 9th Via: Blu-ray Plot: A small-time reporter tries to convince the police that she saw a murder in the apartment across from hers. Rating: 7.2/10 Why Did I Watch It? After listening to editor Paul Hirsch's audiobook, I had to check it out.
2 months, 1 week ago

« Prev12 3 4 5 6 7 » 17 » 252 Next »

Comments

Avatar
Posted: 11 years, 2 months ago at Aug 5 13:42
Posted: 11 years, 5 months ago at May 23 16:30
Posted: 11 years, 6 months ago at Apr 12 20:26
All the best, buddy. It'll be great for you.
Posted: 11 years, 6 months ago at Mar 29 15:18
Posted: 11 years, 7 months ago at Mar 22 21:10
So glad you liked it!! Yeah, I'd missed it- sorry for the delay in answering, but life lately has been getting in the way of everything movie-related (more than usual). Could probably use a re-watch of Perks, actually, hehe.
Posted: 11 years, 7 months ago at Mar 13 12:58
Thanks for the vote!
Posted: 11 years, 9 months ago at Jan 2 0:19
Happy New Year to you as well, my friend!!
Posted: 11 years, 9 months ago at Dec 25 23:41
For being a great friend and providing great content, I thank you and wish you a...
Posted: 11 years, 10 months ago at Dec 6 13:33
I still don't know exactly why I stopped... I know for sure it's in part because I my life became much busier since mid-2012. But it also might have something to do with laziness and/or that I just don't have as much to say about movies as I used to, haha. People are still gonna read your stuff no matter what format you present it in, so keep at it.
Posted: 11 years, 10 months ago at Nov 27 12:37
Feels good man. :)
Posted: 11 years, 11 months ago at Nov 14 20:04
It is a shame that you'll leaving this site but I fully honor your decision to work in the army. You have provided a lot of great well-constructed reviews and lists. It will be a shame when they stop being made for a long time if ever but I fully respect the decision that you made. I wish you the best of the luck in your endeavors.
Posted: 11 years, 12 months ago at Oct 23 8:33
Posted: 11 years, 12 months ago at Oct 22 16:43
Clearly a keeper, lol.
Posted: 12 years ago at Oct 18 0:09
Well man, It's gonna suck to see you go, MAYBE for good, as you were pretty much a legend here around Listal. However, if your heart is telling you that the Army is the best thing for you, then by all means, go for it man! I mean, it's a damn sweet gig, and can pretty much only guarantee good results.

Keep in touch til then, eh?
Posted: 12 years ago at Oct 7 20:04
Haha, at the very least, I'm relieved by your comment because it means I'm not alone in NOT thinking it's great or cute or any of that other stuff. It annoyed me on so many levels.
Posted: 12 years ago at Oct 4 18:20
The reasons why I stopped writing full-length reviews were mostly because of things moving forward in my life professionally and in other senses, so this is perfectly normal- in fact, it's the kind of thing that needs to happen. Many congratulations on the accomplishment. :) I got a chance last month to attend the Toronto Film Festival, and while I was there, I realized that, even though my time to watch movies has been reduced as of late, I haven't stopped loving movies. That's not something that goes away. They'll continue to be a super important part of your life even if you don't have as much time because you're moving forward with doing things that are really important for you and your future. Look forward to any review you write, regardless of how frequently they come along, and kudos again on the acceptance!
Posted: 12 years ago at Sep 27 18:10
Not quite... there's still room for a little more. :)

www.listal.com/movie/the-host-2012

Haha, it's not that I want you to watch horrible movies- it's that I enjoy your eviscerations too much, and from what I've been told, this movie is even WORSE.

Surprised at your rating for the last Twilight movie, since it's much higher than the one for the others- at least it seems like it's the only one you didn't hate. I agree that the final battle is all sorts of entertaining... but the twist kinda ruined it for me, I guess.
Posted: 12 years, 1 month ago at Sep 10 18:30
Yeah, I haven't been able to get to the list making as much as I'd like. Been traveling a lot. I finally posted some new director lists that should have been posted months ago. Check em out!
Posted: 12 years, 1 month ago at Sep 4 4:30
Sounds awesome!!
Posted: 12 years, 1 month ago at Aug 27 4:06
Thanks man! I try and come around as often as I can to post my latest reviews. Been really busy lately though with working and other things.